The Subjective Experience of Individuals in Financial Decision-Making: A Contextual Study on the Influence of Behavioral Biases in the Digital Environments

Main Article Content

Moch Arif Hernawan

Abstract

Financial decision-making is a complex interplay of cognitive biases, emotional influences, and contextual factors, particularly in the digital era where financial tools and information are ubiquitous. While behavioral economics has identified biases like loss aversion and overconfidence, little is known about how individuals subjectively experience and interpret these biases in real-world contexts, especially within digital financial ecosystems. This study addresses this gap by employing a phenomenological approach to explore the lived experiences of [insert sample characteristics, e.g., "adult individuals from diverse socio-economic backgrounds"] navigating financial decisions in the presence of behavioral biases and digital influences. The research focuses on participants who are [insert context, e.g., "active users of digital financial platforms, such as online banking and investment tools"]. Through semi-structured interviews and interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA), three major themes emerged: the emotional dimension of decision-making, the influence of digital environments, and reflective learning from financial outcomes. These findings reveal that emotions and social pressures significantly shape financial behaviors, often exacerbated by the overwhelming flow of digital information. The study contributes to a richer understanding of how individuals perceive and adapt to these challenges, offering practical implications for enhancing financial literacy and designing user-centered digital financial platforms. This research not only expands theoretical knowledge but also provides a foundation for future studies to examine diverse populations and the impact of emerging technologies on financial decision-making.

Article Details

Section

Articles

References

Aouam, T., Lamrani, H., Aguenaou, S., & Diabat, A. (2009). A benchmark based AHP model for credit evaluation. International Journal of Applied Decision Sciences, 2(2), 151–166. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJADS.2009.026550

Børsting, C., Elbæk, C., Mitkidis, P., & Hochman, G. (2024). Resource Constraints Lead to Biased Attention but Decrease Unethical Behavior. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 37(4). Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.2402

Choi, S. S., Taber, J. M., Thompson, C. A., & Sidney, P. G. (2020). Math anxiety, but not induced stress, is associated with objective numeracy. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 26(4), 604–619. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1037/xap0000268

Cohen, D. (1991). The subjective experience of Alzheimer’s disease: The anatomy of an illness as perceived by patients and families. American Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease and Other Dementias, 6(3), 6–11. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1177/153331759100600303

Eppinger, B., Heekeren, H. R., & Li, S.-C. (2018). Age Differences in the Neural Mechanisms of Intertemporal Choice under Subjective Decision Conflict. Cerebral Cortex, 28(11), 3764–3774. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhx239

Graefe, B. J., & Markette, J. F. (2021). Physician descriptions of the influence of pay for performance on medical decision-making. Health Policy OPEN, 2. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpopen.2021.100036

Karimi, M., Tahayori, H., Tirdad, K., & Sadeghian, A. (2023). A perceptual computer for hierarchical portfolio selection based on interval type-2 fuzzy sets. Granular Computing, 8(1), 23–43. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41066-021-00311-0

Kromydas, T. (2020). Educational attainment and gender differences in work-life balance for couples across Europe: A contextual perspective. Social Inclusion, 8(4), 8–22. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v8i4.2920

Lange, A., Prenzler, A., & Zuchandke, A. (2012). How do insured perceive their financial security in the event of illness? - A panel data analysis for Germany. Value in Health, 15(5), 743–749. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2012.02.002

Lucarelli, C., Uberti, P., Brighetti, G., & Maggi, M. (2015). Risky choices and emotion-based learning. Journal of Economic Psychology, 49, 59–73. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2015.04.004

Nguyen, T. H., Shehab, T., & Gao, Z. (2008). Selecting an architecture-engineering team by using fuzzy set theory. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 15(3), 282–298. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1108/09699980810867433

Singh, D., Malik, G., & Jha, A. (2024). Overconfidence bias among retail investors: A systematic review and future research directions. Investment Management and Financial Innovations, 21(1), 302–316. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.21511/imfi.21(1).2024.23

Sul, S., Kim, J., & Choi, I. (2013). Subjective Well-Being and Hedonic Editing: How Happy People Maximize Joint Outcomes of Loss and Gain. Journal of Happiness Studies, 14(4), 1409–1430. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-012-9379-6

Vlaev, I., & Elliott, A. (2014). Financial Well-Being Components. Social Indicators Research, 118(3), 1103–1123. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-013-0462-0

Žabko, O. (2022). Giving (positive) meaning to downward and horizontal occupational mobility to maintain individual well-being. Intersections East European Journal of Society and Politics, 8(2), 120–137. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.17356/ieejsp.v8i2.834