Resisting the Invisible: Lived Experiences of Human Rights Activists under Digital Repression in Authoritarian Regimes

Main Article Content

Endud Badrudin

Abstract

The expanding field of human rights law increasingly intersects with digital technologies, particularly in contexts where authoritarian regimes employ surveillance and censorship to suppress dissent. While legal and policy analyses have addressed these structural challenges, little is known about how human rights defenders experience digital repression at a personal and existential level. This study addresses the question: how do human rights activists interpret and navigate digital repression in authoritarian environments? Using an interpretative phenomenological approach (IPA), the study explores the subjective meanings that activists assign to their encounters with online surveillance, algorithmic censorship, and digital harassment. Data were collected through in-depth semi-structured interviews with twelve activists and analyzed using IPA to identify emergent themes of fear, adaptation, and redefined advocacy. Findings reveal that activists experience digital repression not only as an external constraint but as an internal struggle that reshapes their emotional landscapes, social relationships, and ethical responsibilities. The study highlights how participants resist repression through subtle, relational forms of activism while maintaining agency and commitment. These results deepen our understanding of digital repression by foregrounding the human experience behind abstract policy frameworks. They also underscore the need for future interdisciplinary research to explore long-term psychological impacts and context-sensitive strategies of digital resistance.

Article Details

Section

Articles

References

Barrenger, S. L., Hamovitch, E. K., & Rothman, M. R. (2019). Enacting lived experiences: Peer specialists with criminal justice histories. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal, 42(1), 9–16. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1037/prj0000327

Barry, M. (2021). ‘Walking on ice’: The future of parole in a risk-obsessed society. Theoretical Criminology, 25(2), 325–342. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362480619880555

Boduszek, D., Debowska, A., Sharratt, K., McDermott, D., Sherretts, N., Willmott, D., Popiolek, K., & Hyland, P. (2021). Pathways between types of crime and criminal social identity: A network approach. Journal of Criminal Justice, 72. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2020.101750

Cihan, A., & Sorensen, J. R. (2019). Examining Developmental Patterns of Prison Misconduct: An Integrated Model Approach. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 63(14), 2406–2421. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X19849565

Davies, J., Ugwudike, P., Young, H., Hurrell, C., & Raynor, P. (2021). A Pragmatic Study of the Impact of a Brief Mindfulness Intervention on Prisoners and Staff in a Category B Prison and Men Subject to Community-Based Probation Supervision. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 65(1), 136–156. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X20944664

Dunne, A. L., Lloyd, C., Lee, S., & Daffern, M. (2020). Associations between the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition, alternative model of antisocial personality disorder, psychopathic specifier, and psychopathy-related facets with aggression in a sample of incarcerated males. Personality disorders, 11(2), 108–118. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1037/per0000369

Harris, D. A., Pedneault, A., & Willis, G. (2019). The Pursuit of Primary Human Goods in Men Desisting From Sexual Offending. Sexual Abuse: Journal of Research and Treatment, 31(2), 197–219. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063217729155

Higley, C. A., Lloyd, C. D., & Serin, R. C. (2019). Age and motivation can be specific responsivity features that moderate the relationship between risk and rehabilitation outcome. Law and Human Behavior, 43(6), 558–567. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000348

Jarldorn, M. (2020). Radically Rethinking Social Work in the Criminal (in)Justice System in Australia. Affilia - Journal of Women and Social Work, 35(3), 327–343. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886109919866160

Muller, A. E. (2020). A Systematic Review of Quality of Life Assessments of Offenders. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 64(13–14), 1364–1397. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X19881929

O’Sullivan, R., Hart, W., & Healy, D. (2020). Transformative Rehabilitation: Exploring Prisoners’ Experiences of the Community Based Health and First Aid Programme in Ireland. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 26(1), 63–81. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10610-018-9396-z

Peled-Laskov, R., Shoham, E., & Cojocaru, L. (2019). Work-Related Intervention Programs: Desistance From Criminality and Occupational Integration Among Released Prisoners on Parole. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 63(13), 2264–2290. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X19845762

Sievert, M. (2021). A replication of “Representative bureaucracy and the willingness to coproduce.” Public Administration, 99(3), 616–632. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12743

Smith, H. P., & Smith, H. (2019). A qualitative assessment of a dog program for youth offenders in an adult prison. Public Health Nursing, 36(4), 507–513. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1111/phn.12622

ten Bensel, T., Gibbs, B., & Burkey, C. R. (2019). Female Sex Offenders: Is There a Difference Between Solo and Co-Offenders? Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 34(19), 4061–4084. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260516674202

Zhao, Y., Messner, S. F., Liu, J., & Jin, C. (2019). Prisons as Schools: Inmates’ Participation in Vocational and Academic Programs in Chinese Prisons. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 63(15–16), 2713–2740. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X19861051