Digital Disinformation in Social Media: Current Challenges and Countermeasures
Main Article Content
Abstract
This article examines the proliferation of disinformation in digital environments, with particular emphasis on social media platforms such as Facebook, Twitter (X), and TikTok. Through analysis of current research and five case studies from diverse geographic regions — including the United States, Indonesia, Brazil, India, and Germany — we identify key factors contributing to the spread of false information online and evaluate contemporary countermeasures. The findings indicate that algorithmic amplification, cognitive biases, and inadequate digital literacy significantly influence disinformation dissemination. We propose a multi-stakeholder framework combining technological solutions, media literacy education, and platform accountability to effectively combat digital disinformation. The research contributes to understanding how false information flourishes online and offers practical approaches for mitigating its societal impact.
Article Details
Section
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Bradshaw, S., & Howard, P. N. (2019). The Global Disinformation Order: 2019 Global Inventory of Organised Social Media Manipulation. Oxford Internet Institute.
Broniatowski, D. A., et al. (2021). Twitter and Facebook posts about COVID-19 are less likely to spread misinformation compared to other health topics. PLOS ONE, 16(1), e0246419.
Fisher, M., & Taub, A. (2018). How Everyday Social Media Users Become Real-World Extremists. The New York Times.
Gabielkov, M., et al. (2016). Social Clicks: What and Who Gets Read on Twitter? ACM SIGMETRICS Performance Evaluation Review, 44(1), 179-192.
Jack, C. (2017). Lexicon of Lies: Terms for Problematic Information. Data & Society Research Institute.
Jeong, S. H., et al. (2012). How media literacy interventions affect skepticism toward advertising. Mass Communication and Society, 15(3), 396-419.
Johnson, H. M., & Seifert, C. M. (1994). Sources of the continued influence effect: When misinformation in memory affects later inferences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20(6), 1420-1436.
Marsden, C., & Meyer, T. (2019). Regulating disinformation with artificial intelligence. European Parliamentary Research Service.
Nickerson, R. S. (1998). Confirmation bias: A ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises. Review of General Psychology, 2(2), 175-220.
Nyhan, B., & Reifler, J. (2010). When corrections fail: The persistence of political misperceptions. Political Behavior, 32(2), 303-330.
Nyhan, B., et al. (2020). Taking fact-checks literally but not seriously? The effects of journalistic fact-checking on factual beliefs and candidate favorability. Political Behavior, 42, 939-960.
Pariser, E. (2011). The Filter Bubble: What the Internet Is Hiding from You. Penguin Press.
Pennycook, G., et al. (2021). Shifting attention to accuracy can reduce misinformation online. Nature, 592(7855), 590-595.
Van Bavel, J. J., & Pereira, A. (2018). The partisan brain: An identity-based model of political belief. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 22(3), 213-224.
Vosoughi, S., et al. (2018). The spread of true and false news online. Science, 359(6380), 1146-1151.
Wardle, C., & Derakhshan, H. (2017). Information Disorder: Toward an interdisciplinary framework for research and policymaking. Council of Europe.
Wineburg, S., & McGrew, S. (2019). Lateral reading: Reading less and learning more when evaluating digital information. Teachers College Record, 121(11), 1-40.