Between Clicks and Conscience: Editorial Sense-Making in Local Digital Newsrooms
Main Article Content
Abstract
Digital journalism has transformed how editorial decisions are made, increasingly shifting authority from human judgment to algorithmic systems. Within this evolving landscape, local online news editors in Indonesia face mounting pressure to balance journalistic integrity with platform-driven performance metrics. While prior research has examined institutional and structural responses to algorithmic influence, there remains limited understanding of how editors themselves experience and interpret these pressures in their daily routines. This study asks: how do local Indonesian online editors make sense of their editorial judgment under the influence of algorithms and audience metrics?
Employing an interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA), this research investigates the lived experiences of eight local news editors (four women and four men) from a diverse range of Indonesian digital media outlets, including both independent and corporate-owned organizations operating in urban and regional contexts. Data were gathered through in-depth, semi-structured interviews and analyzed thematically to uncover shared patterns of meaning.
Three dominant experiential themes emerged: (1) the persistent tension between editorial ideals and audience-driven metrics; (2) the shifting definition of newsworthiness shaped by algorithmic visibility and platform logic; and (3) the emergence of internal ethical dilemmas and professional identity fragmentation. These findings highlight not only operational challenges but also the emotional and moral negotiations embedded in digital editorial practices.
By illuminating these dynamics, the study contributes to a deeper understanding of editorial subjectivity in the context of algorithmic governance. It also provides practical implications for newsroom leadership and journalism educators to develop strategies that support editorial autonomy and well-being amid digital pressures. This research lays the groundwork for further phenomenological inquiries into the affective dimensions of digital media labor.
Article Details
Section

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Adams, A. D. (2023). Werewolf on campus: A case study in inoculation theory and gamified one-shot library instruction. Public Services Quarterly, 19(4), 255–272. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1080/15228959.2023.2252322
Albaladejo-Ortega, S., Hernández-Pérez, J. F., & Pérez-Escolar, M. (2024). Playing with truth: Newsgames as a sustainable literacy tool for verification. Revista Mediterranea de Comunicacion, 15(2). Scopus. https://doi.org/10.14198/MEDCOM.26757
Allen, J. K., Griffin, R. A., & Mindrila, D. (2022). Discerning (Dis)information: Teacher perceptions of critical media literacy. Journal of Media Literacy Education, 14(3), 1–16. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.23860/JMLE-2022-14-3-1
Austin, E. W., Austin, B. W., Borah, P., Domgaard, S., & McPherson, S. M. (2023). How Media Literacy, Trust of Experts and Flu Vaccine Behaviors Associated with COVID-19 Vaccine Intentions. American Journal of Health Promotion, 37(4), 464–470. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1177/08901171221132750
Barbaro, A., Amicarella, S. E., Ferrari, P., Sorcini, I., & Zedda, M. (2022). Embedded librarians: An innovative experience in health and wellness communication. Health Information and Libraries Journal, 39(2), 194–197. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1111/hir.12410
Blanco-Castilla, E., Fernández-Torres, M.-J., & Cano-Galindo, J. (2022). Disinformation and hate speech toward female sports journalists. Profesional de la Informacion, 31(6). Scopus. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2022.nov.13
Carr, P. R., Cuervo Sanchez, S. L., & Daros, M. A. (2020). Citizen Engagement in the Contemporary Era of Fake News: Hegemonic Distraction or Control of the Social Media Context? Postdigital Science and Education, 2(1), 39–60. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-019-00052-z
Cooper, T. (2019). Calling out ‘alternative facts’: Curriculum to develop students’ capacity to engage critically with contradictory sources. Teaching in Higher Education, 24(3), 444–459. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2019.1566220
Diepeveen, S., & Pinet, M. (2022). User perspectives on digital literacy as a response to misinformation. Development Policy Review, 40(S2). Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1111/dpr.12671
Dunleavy, V. O., Ahn, R. J., Grace, L. D., & Mayo, D. (2024). Acceptability and Feasibility of “Latinos Unidos”: A Microgame Resource Combatting Health Misinformation for Latinos Living with HIV. Journal of Health Communication, 29(5), 307–318. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2024.2339238
Foà, C., Couraceiro, P., & Pinto-Martinho, A. (2024). Decoding algorithmic literacy among journalistsMethodological tool design and validationfor preliminary study in the Portuguese context. Observatorio, 83–106. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.15847/obsOBS18520242433
Frau-Meigs, D. (2024). Algorithm Literacy as a Subset of Media and Information Literacy: Competences and Design Considerations. Digital, 4(2), 512–528. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.3390/digital4020026
Grotlüschen, A., Dutz, G., & Skowranek, K. (2024). Writing with artificial intelligence? Ad-hoc-survey findings raise awareness for critical literacy at the International Literacy Day. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 43(4), 371–384. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1080/02601370.2024.2349657
Jamil, S., & Alazrak, N. (2023). Media and Information Literacy Education: Exploring the gaps in curriculum development at the Egyptian universities. World of Media, 2023(3), 5–24. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.30547/worldofmedia.3.2023.1
Kresin, S., Kremer, K., Nehring, A., & Büssing, A. G. (2025). Students’ awareness and conceptions of science-related communication mechanisms on social media. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 62(3), 756–791. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21973