Exploring Ethical Meaning and Professional Resilience in Building Consumer Trust through Sustainable Brand Communication
Main Article Content
Abstract
Brand sustainability communication has become a critical concern in contemporary marketing, reflecting increasing expectations for ethical transparency, authenticity, and accountability in digital environments. However, the linkage between sustainability messages and the actual development of consumer trust remains underexplored. While prior studies have mainly used quantitative models to examine brand credibility and consumer attitudes, limited research has illuminated how individuals subjectively experience and construct trust in response to sustainability communication on social media. This study aims to bridge that gap by precisely exploring how consumers interpret, emotionally engage with, and ethically evaluate sustainability messages. Employing an interpretative phenomenological approach (IPA), in-depth semi-structured interviews were conducted with twelve active social media users, and the data were thematically analyzed to identify key experiential patterns of trust formation. Findings reveal three interconnected dimensions of trust: (1) authenticity, manifested through transparent and value-consistent messages; (2) dialogical interaction, shaped by perceived openness and reciprocity between brand and audience; and (3) moral resonance, emerging when brand ethics align with consumers’ personal moral frameworks. Trust thus evolves as a relational and emotional process rather than a fixed cognitive judgment. This refined understanding contributes to theory by clarifying how emotional and ethical engagement underpin trust in digital sustainability communication. Practically, it guides brands toward fostering credible and value-driven relationships through consistent, transparent storytelling. The study further recommends future comparative research on cultural variations in the lived experience of digital trust to enrich cross-contextual insights.
Article Details
Section

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Alberts, K. (2025). Unravelling the web: Exploring the dynamics of online disinformation and its impact on democracy in Africa. Canadian Journal of African Studies, 59(2), 333–359. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1080/00083968.2025.2491679
Anstead, N., Edwards, L., Livingstone, S., & Stoilova, M. (2025). The Potential for Media Literacy to Combat Misinformation: Results of a Rapid Evidence Assessment. International Journal of Communication, 19, 2129–2151. Scopus. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-105008414959&partnerID=40&md5=783347053bb278e39e4b5123b9b082b9
Brutti, N. (2025). Tortious disinformation and digital platforms. European Journal of Privacy Law and Technologies, 2025(1). Scopus. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-105009223939&partnerID=40&md5=ca627f8f1625bbe3be3f0cd999784193
Burns, K., Halvey, O., Ó Súilleabháin, F., O’Callaghan, E., & Lins de Holanda Coelho, G. (2024). The Social Media, Online and Digital Abuse and Harassment of Social Workers, Probation Officers and Social Work Students in Ireland: A National Survey. British Journal of Social Work, 54(7), 3274–3294. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcae091
Caruso, C. (2025). Towards the Institutions of Freedom: The European Public Discourse in the Digital Era. German Law Journal, 26(1), 114–137. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1017/glj.2024.68
Dzogovic, S. A., Zdravkovska-Adamova, B., & Ramćilović, Z. (2025). The Role of Higher Education in Promoting Media Literacy in the Age of Digital Disinformation. Human Research in Rehabilitation, 15(2), 311–330. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.21554/hrr.092506
Farrand, B., Carrapiço, H., & Turobov, A. (2024). The new geopolitics of EU cybersecurity: Security, economy and sovereignty. International Affairs, 100(6), 2379–2397. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iiae231
Fisher, J., Gadjanova, E., & Hitchen, J. (2024). WhatsApp and political communication in West Africa: Accounting for differences in parties’ organization and message discipline online. Party Politics, 30(5), 934–948. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1177/13540688231188690
García Gordillo, M., Rivas-de-Roca, R., & de-Lima-Santos, M.-F. (2025). The Fact-Checking Initiatives in the EU: A Diverse Ecosystem Against Disinformation. Media and Communication, 13. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.9421
Hameleers, M. (2025). The Nature of Visual Disinformation Online: A Qualitative Content Analysis of Alternative and Social Media in the Netherlands. Political Communication, 42(1), 108–126. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2024.2354389
Henderson, P., & Lemley, M. A. (2025). The Mirage of Artificial Intelligence Terms of Use Restrictions. Indiana Law Journal, 100(4), 1327–1387. Scopus. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-105011669141&partnerID=40&md5=24231c12dd7643f77bfacff66bc60eb9
Kassymbekova, N., Tolegen, E., Buyenbayeva, Z., Almanova, N., & Shyngyssova, N. (2025). The Impact of the Technological Boom on Traditional and Social Media in Kazakhstan. Studies in Media and Communication, 13(2), 123–133. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.11114/smc.v13i2.7536
Lysenko, A., & Gunitsky, S. (2025). The invisible front: Ukraine’s IT army and the evolution of cyber resistance. Post-Soviet Affairs, 41(4), 263–288. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1080/1060586X.2025.2503658
Marino, E. B., Benitez-Baleato, J. M., & Ribeiro, A. S. (2024). The Polarization Loop: How Emotions Drive Propagation of Disinformation in Online Media—The Case of Conspiracy Theories and Extreme Right Movements in Southern Europe. Social Sciences, 13(11). Scopus. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci13110603
Matamoros-Fernández, A., & Jude, N. (2025). The importance of centering harm in data infrastructures for ‘soft moderation’: X’s Community Notes as a case study. New Media and Society, 27(4), 1986–2011. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448251314399
Montiel Torres, M. F., Teruel Rodríguez, L., García-Faroldi, L., & Martín-Martín, F. M. (2025). Vulnerable groups and disinformation. An analysis of the Andalusian reality. Doxa Comunicacion, 2025(41), 369–393. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.31921/doxacom.n41a2902
Moore, R. C., Dahlke, R., Forberg, P. L., & Hancock, J. T. (2024). The Private Life of QAnon: A Mixed Methods Investigation of Americans’ Exposure to QAnon Content on the Web. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 8(CSCW2). Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1145/3687057
Morais, R., & Piñeiro-Naval, V. (2025). The presence of regional and local aspects about disinformation in scientific production in Spain and Portugal: A review of the state of the art. Doxa Comunicacion, 2025-July-December(41), 341–368. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.31921/doxacom.n41a2905
Moreno Bobadilla, Á. (2024). The European fight against disinformation in electoral processes. Juridicas, 21(2), 97–113. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.17151/jurid.2024.21.2.6
Mukhlis, L. (2025a). A Phenomenological Study of Personal Spiritual Experiences in Navigating Religious Pluralism within Interfaith Communities. Irfana: Journal of Religious Studies, 1(6), 212–220.
Mukhlis, L. (2025b). Spiritual Grounds for Economic Growth: A Qualitative Exploration of Rural Indonesian Women’s Transformative Journeys Through Mosque-Led Empowerment Programs. Servina: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat, 1(8), 289–298.
Mukhlis, L., & Abdullah, M. N. (2025). Hukum Keluarga Islam di Indonesia (1st ed.). Mukhlisina Revolution Center.
Mukhlis, L., Arifin, T., Ridwan, A. H., & Zulbaidah. (2024). Integrating Artificial Intelligenceand Maqāṣid al-Syarī‘ah: Revolutionizing Indonesia’s Sharia Online Trading System. Computer Fraud and Security, 2024(11), 301–309. https://doi.org/10.52710/cfs.238
Mukhlis, L., Arifin, T., Ridwan, A. H., & Zulbaidah. (2025). Reorientation of Sharia Stock Regulations: Integrating Taṣarrufāt al-Rasūl and Maqāṣid al-Sharī‘ah for Justice and Sustainability. Journal of Information Systems Engineering and Management, 10(10s), 58–66. https://doi.org/10.52783/jisem.v10i10s.1341
Mukhlis, L., Arifin, T., Ridwan, A. H., Zulbaidah, Rosadi, A., & Solehudin, E. (2025). Reformulation of Islamic Stock Law: The Application of Taṣarrufāt al-Rasūl and Maqāṣid al-Syarī‘ahto Develop a Dynamic and Sustainable Islamic Capital Market in Indonesia. Journal of Posthumanism, 5(3), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.63332/joph.v5i3.913
Mukhlis, L., Janwari, Y., & Syafe`i, R. (2023). INDONESIA STOCK EXCHANGE: THEORETICAL AND PHILOSOPHICAL ANALYSIS OF MUDHARABAH AND MUSYARAKAH CONTRACTS. Yurisprudentia: Jurnal Hukum Ekonomi, 9(2), 243–264. https://doi.org/10.24952/yurisprudentia.v9i2.8466
Mukhlis, L., Maryam, S., & Sormin, S. A. (2023). Model Pembelajaran Living History Berbasis PjBL Untuk Meningkatkan Keterampilan Histografi Mahasiswa. Jurnal Educatio FKIP UNMA, 9(4), 1800–1809. https://doi.org/10.31949/educatio.v9i4.5595
Mukhlis, L., & Saidah, Y. (2025). Dynamics of Nature-Based learning in Developing Children’s Motoricic Skills: Teacher and Parent Perspectives. HUMANISMA: Journal of Gender Studies, 9(1), 64–79. http://dx.doi.org/10.30983/humanisme.v4i2.9366
Mukhlis, L., Suradi, Janwari, Y., & Syafe`i, R. (2023). Sosialisasi Saham Syariah sebagai Instrumen Pengembangan Ekonomi Masyarakat di Badan Kontak Majelis Taklim (BKMT) Kabupaten Mandailing Natal. Jurnal Pengabdian Multidisiplin, 3(2), 2–9. https://doi.org/10.51214/japamul.v3i2.604
Ó Fathaigh, R. Ó., Buijs, D., & van Hoboken, J. (2025). The Regulation of Disinformation Under the Digital Services Act. Media and Communication, 13. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.9615
Oleksiyuk, T. (2025). The right to access official information as a resilience-improving tool: Ukrainian lessons during wartime. Social Sciences and Humanities Open, 11. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.101549
Ong, J. C., & Donovan, J. (2025). True Costs of Misinformation Introduction. International Journal of Communication, 19, 2307–2315. Scopus. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-105008397033&partnerID=40&md5=34ff65ea1866a6cd176c55844f07f372
Padilla, A., Coromina, Ò., & Prado, E. (2025). “Trusted Media” on YouTube: Volume and visibility of public media in search results. Revista Latina de Comunicacion Social, 2025(83). Scopus. https://doi.org/10.4185/rlcs-2025-2336
Rojas-Torrijos, J. L., & Garrote-Fuentes, Á. (2025). The Factuality of News on Twitter According to Digital Qualified Audiences: Expectations, Perceptions, and Divergences with Journalism Considerations. Journalism and Media, 6(1). Scopus. https://doi.org/10.3390/journalmedia6010003
Samuelsen, R. J., Kalsnes, B., & Steensen, S. (2025). The Relevance of Technology to Information Verification: Insights from Norwegian Journalism During a National Election. Journalism Practice, 19(8), 1683–1702. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2023.2280676
Sarno, D. M., & Black, J. (2024). Who Gets Caught in the Web of Lies?: Understanding Susceptibility to Phishing Emails, Fake News Headlines, and Scam Text Messages. Human Factors, 66(6), 1742–1753. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1177/00187208231173263
Seybold, S. L. (2025). Voter deterrence campaigns and the moral-epistemic landscape of political microtargeting. Ethics and Information Technology, 27(2). Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-025-09831-8
Tanner, S., & Gillardin, F. (2025). Toxic Communication on TikTok: Sigma Masculinities and Gendered Disinformation. Social Media and Society, 11(1). Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051251313844
Varela da Costa, J., Dongo, D. F., & Mira da Silva, M. (2025). Using MCDA to select countermeasures against fake news. Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society, 23(1), 54–103. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1108/JICES-07-2024-0089
Zecchinon, P., & Standaert, O. (2025). The War in Ukraine Through the Prism of Visual Disinformation and the Limits of Specialized Fact-Checking. A Case-Study at Le Monde. Digital Journalism, 13(1), 61–79. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2024.2332609