Exploring Citizens’ Lived Experiences of Trust in Government Communication Amid Digital Disinformation

Main Article Content

Ibnu Sumarna
Galih Ayu Palupi

Abstract

Political communication in the digital era has undergone a major transformation due to the rise of disinformation and declining public trust in government institutions. Within this evolving landscape, understanding the subjective experience of trust has become central to analyzing how citizens interpret and respond to government messages. However, prior studies have largely relied on quantitative or message-effect approaches, leaving limited insight into how individuals actually experience and reconstruct trust amid conflicting information environments. Therefore, this study explicitly aims to examine how citizens subjectively construct and interpret trust in government communication within digital disinformation settings. This study addresses that gap by employing an Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (IPA) to explore how citizens make sense of government communication in the context of digital disinformation. Data were collected through semi-structured, in-depth interviews with 12 digitally active citizens, and analyzed thematically to uncover core experiential patterns. The findings reveal that trust emerges as a fluid, interpretative process, shaped by emotion, reflection, and social interaction rather than by message accuracy alone. Participants described trust as being reconstructed through authenticity, empathy, and moral coherence in government communication. These results provide a deeper understanding of trust as a lived experience, offering new theoretical insights into the relational and ethical dimensions of political communication. The study underscores the need for dialogical and empathetic communication strategies in public governance and invites further research to expand phenomenological inquiry across different cultural and institutional contexts.

Article Details

Section

Articles

References

Arribas, C. M., Arcos, R., & Gertrudix, M. (2025). Rethinking education and training to counter AI-enhanced disinformation and information manipulations in Europe: A Delphi study. Cogent Social Sciences, 11(1). Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2025.2501759

Balcytiene, A. (2025). Strengthening Responsible Journalism Through Self‐Efficacious Learning‐Oriented Media Literacy Interventions. Media and Communication, 13. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.9038

Bhat, T. F., Bhat, R. A., Tramboo, I. A., & Antony, S. (2025). Surveilled Selves and Silenced Voices: A Linguistic and Gendered Critique of Privacy Invasion in Marie Lu’s Warcross. Forum for Linguistic Studies, 7(5), 437–448. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v7i5.9505

Bonet-Jover, A., Sepulveda-Torres, R., Saquete, E., Martínez-Barco, P., & Nieto-Pérez, M. (2024). RUN-AS: a novel approach to annotate news reliability for disinformation detection. Language Resources and Evaluation, 58(2), 609–639. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10579-023-09678-9

Bruno, N., de Santis, A., & Moriggi, S. (2025). Teachers competencies in evaluating digital sources and tackling disinformation: Implications for media literacy education. Journal of E-Learning and Knowledge Society, 21(1), 85–99. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.20368/1971-8829/1136182

Carreiras, H., & Castro, C. (2012). Qualitative methods in military studies: Research experiences and challenges (p. 194). Taylor and Francis; Scopus. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203099223

Carvalho, H., Sousa, J. C., & Lapa, T. (2025). Public Opinion and Institutional Trust in Europe: The contradictory role of the media in the digital age. Media e Jornalismo, 25(46). Scopus. https://doi.org/10.14195/2183-5462_46_5

Daly, K. J. (2007). Qualitative methods for family studies & human development (p. 293). SAGE Publications Inc.; Scopus. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452224800

Denniss, E., & Lindberg, R. (2025). Social media and the spread of misinformation: Infectious and a threat to public health. Health Promotion International, 40(2). Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/daaf023

Fife, W. (2020). Counting as a Qualitative Method: Grappling with the Reliability Issue in Ethnographic Research (p. 140). Springer International Publishing; Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-34803-8

Gurung, M. I., Agarwal, N., Bhuiyan, M. M. I., & Poudel, D. (2025). Symbolic signals on Instagram: How visual media shapes engagement, emotion, trust, and diffusion. Social Network Analysis and Mining, 15(1). Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13278-025-01469-0

Hägle, O., Escher, S., Heil, R., & Jahnel, J. (2025). Structuring different manifestations of misinformation for better policy development using a decision tree-based approach. Policy and Internet, 17(2). Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1002/poi3.420

Hillman, W., & Radel, K. (2018). Qualitative methods in tourism research: Theory and practice (p. 294). Channel View Publications; Scopus. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85050434848&partnerID=40&md5=7ea1e3f0b2027993b53f6a795804ee51

Hoştut, S., Güdekli, İ. A., & Güzeldağ, F. (2024). Safeguarding Truth in Turmoil: A Study of the Turkish Government’s Strategic Deployment of Twitter during the February 6, 2023, Earthquakes. Bilig, 2024(108), 51–82. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.12995/bilig.10803

Iijima, K., Akishita, M., Endo, T., Ichikawa, T., Ozaki, N., Ogasawara, K., Kihara, Y., Kuzuya, M., Komatsu, H., & Terasaki, H. (2025). Reconstruction of a resilient and secure community and medical care system in the coronavirus era – English translation of the Japanese opinion released from the Science Council of Japan. Geriatrics and Gerontology International, 25(4), 481–490. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1111/ggi.15073

Iosifides, T. (2016). Qualitative Methods in Migration Studies: A Critical Realist Perspective (p. 266). Taylor and Francis; Scopus. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315603124

Kawamura, Y. (2020). DOING RESEARCH IN FASHION AND DRESS: An Introduction to Qualitative Methods, 2nd edition (p. 166). Bloomsbury Publishing Plc.; Scopus. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85188589040&partnerID=40&md5=b3db406659cd1ea5b20e05664bec39a3

Khaled, W. (2024). Securing brand trust and reputation in an era of political polarisation and AI-driven disinformation. Journal of Brand Strategy, 13(1), 6–14. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.69554/pjfe5856

Longhofer, J., Floersch, J., & Hoy, J. (2012). Qualitative Methods for Practice Research (p. 224). Oxford University Press; Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195398472.001.0001

Lutz, W., & Knox, S. (2014). Quantitative and qualitative methods in psychotherapy research (p. 448). Taylor and Francis; Scopus. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203386071

McNabb, D. E. (2015). Research methods for political science: Quantitative and qualitative methods: Second edition (p. 426). Taylor and Francis; Scopus. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315701141

Migdal, A. B. (2018). Qualitative Methods in Quantum Theory (p. 460). CRC Press; Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1201/9780429497940

Monaci, S., & Persico, S. (2025). Regulating Disinformation and Ideological Entrepreneurs: An Exploratory Research on the Digital Services Act Implementation. Media and Communication, 13. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.9471

Mukhlis, L. (2025a). A Phenomenological Study of Personal Spiritual Experiences in Navigating Religious Pluralism within Interfaith Communities. Irfana: Journal of Religious Studies, 1(6), 212–220.

Mukhlis, L. (2025b). Spiritual Grounds for Economic Growth: A Qualitative Exploration of Rural Indonesian Women’s Transformative Journeys Through Mosque-Led Empowerment Programs. Servina: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat, 1(8), 289–298.

Mukhlis, L., & Abdullah, M. N. (2025). Hukum Keluarga Islam di Indonesia (1st ed.). Mukhlisina Revolution Center.

Mukhlis, L., Arifin, T., Ridwan, A. H., & Zulbaidah. (2024). Integrating Artificial Intelligenceand Maqāṣid al-Syarī‘ah: Revolutionizing Indonesia’s Sharia Online Trading System. Computer Fraud and Security, 2024(11), 301–309. https://doi.org/10.52710/cfs.238

Mukhlis, L., Arifin, T., Ridwan, A. H., & Zulbaidah. (2025). Reorientation of Sharia Stock Regulations: Integrating Taṣarrufāt al-Rasūl and Maqāṣid al-Sharī‘ah for Justice and Sustainability. Journal of Information Systems Engineering and Management, 10(10s), 58–66. https://doi.org/10.52783/jisem.v10i10s.1341

Mukhlis, L., Arifin, T., Ridwan, A. H., Zulbaidah, Rosadi, A., & Solehudin, E. (2025). Reformulation of Islamic Stock Law: The Application of Taṣarrufāt al-Rasūl and Maqāṣid al-Syarī‘ahto Develop a Dynamic and Sustainable Islamic Capital Market in Indonesia. Journal of Posthumanism, 5(3), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.63332/joph.v5i3.913

Mukhlis, L., Janwari, Y., & Syafe`i, R. (2023). INDONESIA STOCK EXCHANGE: THEORETICAL AND PHILOSOPHICAL ANALYSIS OF MUDHARABAH AND MUSYARAKAH CONTRACTS. Yurisprudentia: Jurnal Hukum Ekonomi, 9(2), 243–264. https://doi.org/10.24952/yurisprudentia.v9i2.8466

Mukhlis, L., Maryam, S., & Sormin, S. A. (2023). Model Pembelajaran Living History Berbasis PjBL Untuk Meningkatkan Keterampilan Histografi Mahasiswa. Jurnal Educatio FKIP UNMA, 9(4), 1800–1809. https://doi.org/10.31949/educatio.v9i4.5595

Mukhlis, L., & Saidah, Y. (2025). Dynamics of Nature-Based learning in Developing Children’s Motoricic Skills: Teacher and Parent Perspectives. HUMANISMA: Journal of Gender Studies, 9(1), 64–79. http://dx.doi.org/10.30983/humanisme.v4i2.9366

Mukhlis, L., Suradi, Janwari, Y., & Syafe`i, R. (2023). Sosialisasi Saham Syariah sebagai Instrumen Pengembangan Ekonomi Masyarakat di Badan Kontak Majelis Taklim (BKMT) Kabupaten Mandailing Natal. Jurnal Pengabdian Multidisiplin, 3(2), 2–9. https://doi.org/10.51214/japamul.v3i2.604

Oleart, A., & Rone, J. (2025). Reversing the Privatisation of the Public Sphere: Democratic Alternatives to the EU’s Regulation of Disinformation. Media and Communication, 13. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.9496

Sánchez-Sobradillo, I., & Masegosa-Sánchez, R. (2025). Spanish high schools as dynamic hubs for media and information literacy: The case of inFORMADOS as an educational experience taught by journalists. Doxa Comunicacion, 2025-July-December(41), 469–488. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.31921/doxacom.n41a2865

Sehl, A. (2024). Public service media as pivotal in combating misinformation and disinformation: Prerequisites and approaches. European Journal of Communication, 39(6), 582–594. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1177/02673231241294185

Subekti, D., Yusuf, M., Saadah, M., & Wahid, M. (2025). Social media and disinformation for candidates: The evidence in the 2024 Indonesian presidential election. Frontiers in Political Science, 7. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpos.2025.1625535

Trithara, D. (2025). Securitizing Disinformation: The Case of Westminster’s Digital, Culture, Media and Sport Committee. Democracy and Security, 21(3), 288–315. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1080/17419166.2020.1740685

van der Eem, M., van Drie, J., Brand-Gruwel, S., & van Boxtel, C. (2025). Students evaluating the trustworthiness of historical sources and internet sources: A comparison. British Educational Research Journal, 51(2), 665–686. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.4095

Watt, N., Montaña-Niño, S., & Riedlinger, M. (2025). The Art of the (Platform) Deal Tech Platforms Fact Checkers the Politics of Truth. Weizenbaum Journal of the Digital Society, 5(2). Scopus. https://doi.org/10.34669/wi.wjds/5.2.1