Exploring the Meaning of Religious Identity and Political Engagement: A Phenomenological Exploration of Personal Narratives
Main Article Content
Abstract
The relationship between religion and politics has been a central topic of study in the social sciences, with a growing interest in how religious identity shapes political ideologies. While existing research has largely focused on institutional dynamics and political ideologies, the gap in understanding the specific, personal, and subjective experiences of individuals navigating the intersection of religious and political identities remains underexplored in the literature. This study seeks to address this gap by exploring how individuals' religious beliefs influence their political views and engagement. Using an interpretative phenomenological approach, we examine the lived experiences of individuals to uncover the meaning they ascribe to their religious and political identities. Through in-depth interviews with 15 participants, we identified key themes related to the influence of religious identity on political participation and decision-making, as well as the personal conflicts arising from discrepancies between religious and political ideologies. Our findings suggest that religious beliefs profoundly shape individuals' political perspectives, often guiding their political actions and decisions. These insights contribute to a deeper understanding of the personal dimensions of political engagement, challenging the prevailing focus on macro-level analyses. The study’s findings have important implications for future research, particularly in understanding the role of religion in personal political engagement and the potential for further exploration of this intersection across different cultural and religious contexts.
Article Details
Section

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Amir, S. (2019). Contempt and labour: An exploration through muslim barbers of South Asia. Religions, 10(11). Scopus. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel10110616
Braybrook, D., Bristowe, K., Timmins, L., Roach, A., Day, E., Clift, P., Rose, R., Marshall, S., Johnson, K., Sleeman, K. E., & Harding, R. (2022). Communication about sexual orientation and gender between clinicians, LGBT+ people facing serious illness and their significant others: A qualitative interview study of experiences, preferences and recommendations. BMJ Quality and Safety, 32(2), 109–120. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2022-014792
Chen, Z., & He, Y. (2024). Correlation of Christian ethics and developments in artificial intelligence. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 36(7), 1635–1645. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2022.2106422
Dutta, S. (2022). Becoming equals: The meaning and practice of gender equality in an Islamic feminist movement in India. Feminist Theory, 23(4), 423–443. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1177/14647001211023641
Machouche, S., Bensaid, B., & Ahmed, Z. (2019). Crossroads between Islamic spirituality and the instruction of science. Kemanusiaan, 26, 23–45. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.21315/kajh2019.26.s1.2
Maltabarova, M. (2022). Visiting a sufi shaykh: A contemporary experience of religious pilgrimage. Teosofi: Jurnal Tasawuf dan Pemikiran Islam, 12(2), 167–186. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.15642/teosofi.2022.12.2.167-186
Meiring, A. M. (2020). An apocalyptic agenda for mission in our time. Verbum et Ecclesia, 41(1), 1–8. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.4102/VE.V41I1.2144
Nicolae, T. (2023). The Western Revival of Goddess Worship. Feminist Theology, 31(2), 130–142. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1177/09667350221135089
Oviedo, L. (2022). ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND THEOLOGY: LOOKING FOR A POSITIVE—BUT NOT UNCRITICAL—RECEPTION: with Andrea Vestrucci, “Introduction: Five Steps Towards a Religion–AI Dialogue”; Lluís Oviedo, “AI and Theology: Looking for a Positive—But Not Uncritical—Reception”; Christoph Benzmüller, “Symbolic AI and Gödel’s Ontological Argument”; Sara Lumbreras, “Lessons from the Quest for Artificial Consciousness: The Emergence Criterion, Insight-Oriented AI, and Imago Dei”; Marius Dorobantu, “Artificial Intelligence as a Testing Ground for Key Theological Questions”; and Andrea Vestrucci, “Artificial Intelligence and God’s Existence: Intersecting Theology and Computation.” Zygon, 57(4), 938–952. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1111/zygo.12832
Panchenko, S., Bakhov, I., Pavelchuk, I., & Kostenko, D. (2023). TOURIST PILGRIMAGE ROUTES OF THE HOLY APOSTLES: TRANSFORMATION OF SACRED ROUTES AS MODERN MEANS OF INTERNATIONAL COMMUNICATION. Relacoes Internacionais no Mundo Atual, 4(42), 765–788. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.21902/Revrima.v4i42.6563
Singh, H., Haghayegh, A. T., Shah, R., Cheung, L., Wijekoon, S., Reel, K., & Sangrar, R. (2023). A qualitative exploration of allied health providers’ perspectives on cultural humility in palliative and end-of-life care. BMC Palliative Care, 22(1). Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12904-023-01214-4
Soekiswati, S., Rizka, R., Herawati, E., Alam, A., Budiono, A., & Wardiono, K. (2024). Exploration of the Impact of Religious Activities on Waste Management Behavior: An Analysis of the Understanding of Environmental Ethics. WSEAS Transactions on Environment and Development, 20, 46–58. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.37394/232015.2024.20.6
Suherman, U., Budiman, N., Suryana, D., Yudha, E. S., Ahmad, A. B., & Bin Saper, M. N. (2019). Dimension of peace culture based on Al-quran values. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 7(10), 2171–2178. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2019.071015
Verhofstadt, M., Moureau, L., Pardon, K., & Liégeois, A. (2024). Ethical perspectives regarding Euthanasia, including in the context of adult psychiatry: A qualitative interview study among healthcare workers in Belgium. BMC Medical Ethics, 25(1). Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-024-01063-7
Wan, Z., & Palmer, D. A. (2020). The cosmopolitan moment in colonial modernity: The bahá’í faith, spiritual networks, and universalist movements in early twentieth-century China. Modern Asian Studies, 54(6), 1787–1827. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0026749X19000210