Forgiveness Experiences among Victims of Religiously Based Social Conflicts
Main Article Content
Abstract
Forgiveness in the context of religiously based social conflicts represents a complex phenomenon at the intersection of religious philosophy, ethics, and human psychology, requiring a deeper understanding of its personal and sociocultural dimensions. While previous studies have examined forgiveness through theological prescriptions or psychological measures, little is known about how individuals construct and interpret the meaning of forgiveness within their lived experiences. This study addresses this gap by asking: How do victims of religiously based conflicts experience and embody forgiveness in their everyday lives? Using an interpretative phenomenological approach (IPA), the study explores participants’ subjective meaning-making processes and provides a comprehensive answer to the central research question. Data were collected through semi-structured, in-depth interviews with 15 participants and analyzed thematically to uncover essential experiential structures. The findings reveal that forgiveness is a dynamic, multidimensional process involving three key dimensions: personal healing, where individuals reclaim emotional autonomy; spiritual transcendence, where forgiveness is framed as closeness to God; and social reconciliation, where participants rebuild trust within multi-religious communities. These insights go beyond prescriptive theological models and enrich our understanding of forgiveness as a lived, evolving phenomenon shaped by trauma, faith, and cultural contexts. The study contributes to advancing scholarship in religious ethics, phenomenology, and conflict resolution, offering both theoretical and practical implications for counseling, interfaith dialogue, and community-based reconciliation efforts. Future research could expand these findings through comparative studies across diverse cultural and religious contexts to explore the universal and context-specific meanings of forgiveness.
Article Details
Section

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Abdullah, N., Awang, A., & Mat, A. C. (2024). Chinese Muslims and Their Non-Muslim Families on Muamalat Fiqh Co-Existence (Ta’ayush). Global Journal Al-Thaqafah, JULY 2024(SPECIAL ISSUE), 49–66. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.7187/GJATSI072024-4
Ayhan, A. (2022). An Analysis of Legal Realism From the Perspective of Islamic Law. Cumhuriyet Ilahiyat Dergisi, 26(2), 717–741. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.18505/cuid.1151808
Bednarek-Gilland, A. (2015). Researching values with qualitative methods: Empathy, moral boundaries and the politics of research (p. 122). Ashgate Publishing Ltd; Scopus. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84938280606&partnerID=40&md5=9fe04cec3f08b662639e63bdf2de404d
Borcsa, M., & Rober, P. (2015). Research perspectives in couple therapy: Discursive qualitative methods (p. 176). Springer International Publishing; Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23306-2
Carreiras, H., & Castro, C. (2012). Qualitative methods in military studies: Research experiences and challenges (p. 194). Taylor and Francis; Scopus. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203099223
Dalimunthe, M. A., & Riza, F. (2025). Islamic Theological Perspectives on Human Rights: Bridging the Gap between Faith and Universal Principles. Pharos Journal of Theology, 106(SpecialIssue-2), 1–20. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.46222/pharosjot.106.207
Dandirwalu, R., & Qodim, H. (2021). Baileo as a peace model for christian and muslim communities in maluku. HTS Teologiese Studies / Theological Studies, 77(3). Scopus. https://doi.org/10.4102/hts.v77i3.6529
Gibton, D. (2015). Researching education policy, public policy, and policymakers: Qualitative methods and ethical issues (p. 226). Taylor and Francis; Scopus. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315775722
Hammersley, M. (2003). The Dilemma Of Qualitative Method: Herbert Blumer and the Chicago Tradition (p. 271). Taylor and Francis; Scopus. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203392904
Harahap, H. U., Is, M. F., Faza, A. M., & Sebyar, M. H. (2025). Legal Status of a Wife Leaving Her Husband and Vice Versa in Contextual Fiqh Studies: A Pre-Divorce Analysis. Jurnal Ilmiah Mizani, 12(1), 50–63. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.29300/mzn.v12i1.7158
Hidayah, S. (2024). From unity in diversity to culture wars? Aceh women’s mastery over Adat, Islam, and the state inheritance laws. Women’s Studies International Forum, 103. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2024.102881
Hillman, W., & Radel, K. (2018). Qualitative methods in tourism research: Theory and practice (p. 294). Channel View Publications; Scopus. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85050434848&partnerID=40&md5=7ea1e3f0b2027993b53f6a795804ee51
Iosifides, T. (2016). Qualitative Methods in Migration Studies: A Critical Realist Perspective (p. 266). Taylor and Francis; Scopus. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315603124
Ismail, C. Z., Salim, N. J., & Hanafiah, N. J. A. (2015). Administration and management of waqf land in Malaysia: Issues and solutions. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 6(4S2), 613–620. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.5901/mjss.2015.v6n4s2p613
Lutz, W., & Knox, S. (2014). Quantitative and qualitative methods in psychotherapy research (p. 448). Taylor and Francis; Scopus. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203386071
McNabb, D. E. (2015). Research methods for political science: Quantitative and qualitative methods: Second edition (p. 426). Taylor and Francis; Scopus. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315701141
Migdal, A. B. (2018). Qualitative Methods in Quantum Theory (p. 460). CRC Press; Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1201/9780429497940
Muhajir, M., Kultsum, U., Choiri, M. M., Mustonah, S., Kulkarni, H., & Karim, A. (2025). INTEGRATING MULTICULTURAL VALUES TO FOSTER TOLERANCE AND INCLUSIVITY IN ISLAMIC RELIGIOUS EDUCATION. Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 11(1), 17–32. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.15575/jpi.v11i1.44607
Mukhlis, L. (2025a). A Phenomenological Study of Personal Spiritual Experiences in Navigating Religious Pluralism within Interfaith Communities. Irfana: Journal of Religious Studies, 1(6), 212–220.
Mukhlis, L. (2025b). Spiritual Grounds for Economic Growth: A Qualitative Exploration of Rural Indonesian Women’s Transformative Journeys Through Mosque-Led Empowerment Programs. Servina: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat, 1(8), 289–298.
Mukhlis, L., & Abdullah, M. N. (2025). Hukum Keluarga Islam di Indonesia (1st ed.). Mukhlisina Revolution Center.
Mukhlis, L., Arifin, T., Ridwan, A. H., & Zulbaidah. (2024). Integrating Artificial Intelligenceand Maqāṣid al-Syarī‘ah: Revolutionizing Indonesia’s Sharia Online Trading System. Computer Fraud and Security, 2024(11), 301–309. https://doi.org/10.52710/cfs.238
Mukhlis, L., Arifin, T., Ridwan, A. H., & Zulbaidah. (2025). Reorientation of Sharia Stock Regulations: Integrating Taṣarrufāt al-Rasūl and Maqāṣid al-Sharī‘ah for Justice and Sustainability. Journal of Information Systems Engineering and Management, 10(10s), 58–66. https://doi.org/10.52783/jisem.v10i10s.1341
Mukhlis, L., Arifin, T., Ridwan, A. H., Zulbaidah, Rosadi, A., & Solehudin, E. (2025). Reformulation of Islamic Stock Law: The Application of Taṣarrufāt al-Rasūl and Maqāṣid al-Syarī‘ahto Develop a Dynamic and Sustainable Islamic Capital Market in Indonesia. Journal of Posthumanism, 5(3), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.63332/joph.v5i3.913
Mukhlis, L., Janwari, Y., & Syafe`i, R. (2023). INDONESIA STOCK EXCHANGE: THEORETICAL AND PHILOSOPHICAL ANALYSIS OF MUDHARABAH AND MUSYARAKAH CONTRACTS. Yurisprudentia: Jurnal Hukum Ekonomi, 9(2), 243–264. https://doi.org/10.24952/yurisprudentia.v9i2.8466
Mukhlis, L., Maryam, S., & Sormin, S. A. (2023). Model Pembelajaran Living History Berbasis PjBL Untuk Meningkatkan Keterampilan Histografi Mahasiswa. Jurnal Educatio FKIP UNMA, 9(4), 1800–1809. https://doi.org/10.31949/educatio.v9i4.5595
Mukhlis, L., & Saidah, Y. (2025). Dynamics of Nature-Based learning in Developing Children’s Motoricic Skills: Teacher and Parent Perspectives. HUMANISMA: Journal of Gender Studies, 9(1), 64–79. http://dx.doi.org/10.30983/humanisme.v4i2.9366
Mukhlis, L., Suradi, Janwari, Y., & Syafe`i, R. (2023). Sosialisasi Saham Syariah sebagai Instrumen Pengembangan Ekonomi Masyarakat di Badan Kontak Majelis Taklim (BKMT) Kabupaten Mandailing Natal. Jurnal Pengabdian Multidisiplin, 3(2), 2–9. https://doi.org/10.51214/japamul.v3i2.604
Nozaki, Y., Openshaw, R., & Luke, A. (2005). Introduction. Struggles Over Difference: Curriculum, Texts, and Pedagogy in The Asia-Pacific, 1–10. Scopus.
Prasojo, Z. H., & bin Haji Masri, M. S. (2019). Moderate Islam and the social construction of multi-ethnic communities in the hinterland of west Kalimantan. Indonesian Journal of Islam and Muslim Societies, 9(2), 217–239. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.18326/IJIMS.V9I2.217-240
R’boul, H. (2021). Alternative theorizing of multicultural education: An Islamic perspective on interculturality and social justice. Journal for Multicultural Education, 15(2), 213–224. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1108/JME-07-2020-0073
Rischard, M. (2025). Magical pow(d)ers: The resistance capital of subaltern networks in Wade Davis’s the Serpent and the Rainbow. Frontiers in Human Dynamics, 7. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.3389/fhumd.2025.1394002
Sa’ad, M. (1995). Al-Naz’ah al-Khârijiyyah fî Afkâri wa Harakâti al-Shaykh Ahmad Rifâ’î bi Kâlî Sâlâk. Studia Islamika, 2(2), 123–145. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.15408/sdi.v2i2.837
Setiawan, T., Scheepers, P., & Sterkens, C. (2020). Applicability of the social identity model of collective action in predicting support for interreligious violence in Indonesia. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 23(3), 278–292. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajsp.12397
Sidik, M. F., Vachruddin, V. P., Rusydiyah, E. F., Pertiwi, A. S., & Darmawan, M. A. (2024). Conceptualization of the Integrated Islamic Religious Education Curriculum: A Literature Study at Imam Hatip Schools Turkey and MAN Insan Cendekia Indonesia. Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam, 21(1), 111–130. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.14421/jpai.v21i1.7617
Umam, F., & Barmawi, M. (2023). INDIGENOUS ISLAMIC MULTICULTURALISM: Interreligious Relations in Rural East Java, Indonesia. Ulumuna, 27(2), 649–691. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.20414/ujis.v27i2.752