Technological Innovations in Engineering Practices: A Phenomenological Study of Engineers' Adoption of New Technologies
Main Article Content
Abstract
The rapid transformation of technology has redefined engineering practices across various industries, enhancing efficiency, accuracy, and scalability of implementation. However, the adoption of new technologies is often hindered by individual resistance, limitations in technical training, and steep learning curves, particularly among senior engineers. This study addresses the gap in understanding engineers' subjective experiences in adopting new technologies using a phenomenological approach. Involving 10 engineers in Indonesia, data was collected through in-depth semi-structured interviews. The findings reveal significant challenges, including resistance to change and a lack of training support, but also highlight proactive strategies such as self-learning and team collaboration that facilitate adaptation. Notably, the study identifies the critical role of leadership in fostering a supportive environment for technology adoption and the influence of organizational culture on engineers' willingness to embrace new tools. The implementation of new technologies has been shown to improve productivity and the quality of outcomes, despite requiring an initial adaptation period. This research underscores the importance of a holistic approach to technology adoption, focusing not only on technical training but also on emotional and professional support. These findings offer practical recommendations for industries to design tailored strategies that prioritize both individual and collective needs during technology integration. These insights are relevant for developing more effective technology adoption strategies across various industrial contexts.
Article Details
Section
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Aiken, K. G. (2019). “The environmental consequences … were calamitous”1: Smelter smoke controversies in progressive Era America, 1899–1918. Technology and Culture, 60(1), 132–164. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1353/tech.2019.0004
Akay, M., Subramaniam, S., Brennan, C., Bonato, P., Waits, C. M. K., Wheeler, B. C., & Fotiadis, D. I. (2022). Healthcare Innovations to Address the Challenges of the COVID-19 Pandemic. IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics, 26(7), 3294–3302. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1109/JBHI.2022.3144941
Andersson, J., Hellsmark, H., & Sandén, B. A. (2018). Shaping factors in the emergence of technological innovations: The case of tidal kite technology. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 132, 191–208. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.01.034
Arend, R., Levesque, M., & Minniti, M. (2017). Managing New Technology Using Malleable Profit Functions. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 64(2), 120–133. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2017.2663844
Around. (2023). Protecting U.S. technological advantage (hlm. 144). National Academies Press; Scopus. https://doi.org/10.17226/26647
Baek, J. S., Kim, S., & Harimoto, T. (2019). The Effect of Cultural Differences on a Distant Collaboration for Social Innovation: A Case Study of Designing for Precision Farming in Myanmar and South Korea. Design and Culture, 11(1), 37–58. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1080/17547075.2019.1565400
Hargest, R. (2020). Five thousand years of minimal access surgery: 3000BC to 1850: Early instruments for viewing body cavities. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 113(12), 491–496. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1177/0141076820967913
Ichikohji, T. (2021). A Development Strategy for Hybrid Products: The Case of the Japanese Animation Industry (hlm. 155). Springer Singapore; Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-4353-8
Kohlgrüber, M., Maldonado-Mariscal, K., & Schröder, A. (2021). Mutual Learning in Innovation and Co-Creation Processes: Integrating Technological and Social Innovation. Frontiers in Education, 6. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.498661
König, L., & Jucks, R. (2018). Communicating scientific discoveries and technological innovations: The role of language style (Callaos N., Sanchez B., Tremante A., Welsch F., & Oropeza A., Ed.; Vol. 2, hlm. 46–51). International Institute of Informatics and Systemics, IIIS; Scopus. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85056525097&partnerID=40&md5=c3547cd51fb2fe1cc8463c04a4a8355f
Konings, R. J. M., & Stoller, R. E. (2020). Comprehensive Nuclear Materials (hlm. 4653). Elsevier; Scopus. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85100388733&partnerID=40&md5=6082b8a0f8f55631909c72f6c1199bb6
Loy, J., & Canning, S. (2017). The creative engineering education imperative for twenty-First century living (Gulden T., Pavel N., Kovacevic A., Buck L., Bohemia E., & Berg A., Ed.; hlm. 280–285). Institution of Engineering Designers, The Design Society; Scopus. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85042074386&partnerID=40&md5=9c657f7897576561c21c823f359cfcbd
Mavri, M., Fronimaki, E., & Kadrefi, A. (2023). Survey analysis for the adoption of 3D printing technology: Consumers’ perspective. Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management, 14(2), 353–385. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSTPM-02-2020-0023
Sarkar, S. (2015). Domesticating electric power: Growth of industry, utilities and research in colonial Calcutta. Indian Economic and Social History Review, 52(3), 357–389. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1177/0019464615588431
Smulders, F., Broekhans, B., Kamp, A., Hellendoorn, H., & Welleman, H. (2019). Educate for technological innovation. 2019-August, 479–488. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1017/dsi.2019.52