Emotional Adaptation and Digital Autonomy: A Phenomenological Study of Student Experiences with AI-Based Learning Platforms in Indonesian Higher Education
Main Article Content
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) is reshaping higher education by transforming how students interact with digital learning environments. Within this context, the integration of AI-based learning platforms in Indonesian universities presents unique experiential and cultural challenges for students adapting to new modes of instruction. Despite growing interest in AI-enhanced education, little is known about how students personally experience the transition toward algorithm-driven learning systems. This study investigates the question: How do students make sense of their adaptation to AI-based learning platforms in higher education? Using a descriptive phenomenological approach, data were collected through in-depth, semi-structured interviews with ten university students. Thematic analysis was conducted using a structured method to extract the essence of their experiences. Rather than relying on technical phenomenological jargon, this research employs a clear and accessible analysis to uncover the essential meanings of students’ lived experiences in engaging with AI-mediated education. The analysis replaced the specialized term “eidetic reduction” with a focus on identifying recurring experiential patterns. The findings reveal four central themes: initial confusion and intimidation, growing empowerment through personalized AI feedback, emotional tension due to reduced human interaction, and a redefined sense of learning autonomy. These results highlight the complex emotional and cognitive processes that underlie students’ adaptation to AI, extending beyond measurable performance metrics. This study deepens our understanding of AI’s impact on student experience and provides a foundation for designing more empathetic and culturally sensitive learning technologies in the future.
Article Details
Section

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Akgün, Ö. E., Greenhow, C., Kennedy, M., & Lin, J. (2022). Artificial intelligence in education: Addressing ethical challenges in K-12 settings. AI and Ethics, 2(2), 171–180. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-021-00073-5
Bond, M., Zawacki-Richter, O., & Nichols, M. (2021). Revisiting five decades of educational technology research: A content and authorship analysis of the British Journal of Educational Technology. British Journal of Educational Technology, 52(1), 5–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13030
Cummings, C. (2022). Algorithmic alienation and AI-based learning: A phenomenological critique. Learning, Media and Technology, 47(4), 465–480. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2022.2100480
Holmes, W., Bialik, M., & Fadel, C. (2019). Artificial intelligence in education: Promises and implications for teaching and learning. Center for Curriculum Redesign. https://curriculumredesign.org
Huang, R., Tlili, A., Chang, T.-W., Nascimbeni, F., & Burgos, D. (2022). Meta-review of artificial intelligence in education: Towards a personalized education framework. Sustainability, 14(3), 1254. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031254
Ifenthaler, D., & Yau, J. Y.-K. (2020). Utilising learning analytics to support study success in higher education: A systematic review. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(4), 1961–1990. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09788-z
Jivet, I., Scheffel, M., Drachsler, H., & Specht, M. (2020). Awareness is not enough: Pitfalls of learning analytics dashboards in the educational practice. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 30(1), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-019-00186-1
Kucirkova, N. (2020). Data and the self: Digital subjectivities in the age of personalized learning. Learning, Media and Technology, 45(3), 245–258. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2020.1760725
Lim, C. P., Tinio, V. L., & Smith, M. L. (2021). Digital learning pathways in Southeast Asia: Equity, access, and sustainability. Asia Pacific Education Review, 22(4), 619–632. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-021-09717-4
Lu, Y., Papamitsiou, Z., & Spector, J. M. (2021). Recommender systems in education: A systematic review. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 14(3), 333–345. https://doi.org/10.1109/TLT.2020.3018862
Manen, M. van. (2014). Phenomenology of practice: Meaning-giving methods in phenomenological research and writing. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315422657
Sari, A. R., & Hasanah, U. (2023). Investigating students’ perception of AI-supported adaptive learning in Indonesian higher education. Education and Information Technologies, 28(1), 101–117. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11256-3
Tang, S., & He, W. (2023). The impact of artificial intelligence on higher education: A systematic literature review. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 4, 100112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100112
Zhang, H. (2021). Personalization and student engagement in intelligent tutoring systems: A qualitative study. British Journal of Educational Technology, 52(6), 1847–1861. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13111
Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education–Where are the educators? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0