Exploring Engineers’ Lived Experiences of Digital Transformation

Main Article Content

Priyanto
Kristanto

Abstract

Digital transformation in engineering and manufacturing has reshaped how professionals design, operate, and interact with technology, making it one of the most critical shifts in the contemporary industrial landscape. Within this transformation, engineers’ lived experiences particularly their perceptions of identity, autonomy, and collaboration with intelligent systems remain underexplored despite growing recognition of their importance in human–technology relations. However, there is still a clear research problem, namely the lack of empirical understanding of how engineers experience and make meaning of digital transformation beyond technical and efficiency-driven perspectives. Therefore, this study aims to explicitly address this gap by investigating how engineers interpret, negotiate, and internalize digital transformation in their everyday professional practice. Existing studies have primarily emphasized efficiency and system optimization, leaving a gap in understanding how engineers make sense of technological change as a human and existential experience. Here, this study employs a hermeneutic phenomenological approach to examine how engineers interpret and internalize digital transformation within sustainable manufacturing environments. Using semi-structured interviews with twelve professional engineers and interpretative phenomenological analysis, the research identifies five core themes: identity negotiation, emotional adaptation, human–machine collaboration, sustainability reflection, and reconstructed autonomy. These findings reveal that engineers experience digitalization not as a purely technical transition but as a deeply reflective process involving cognitive reorientation, ethical awareness, and emotional transformation. The results contribute to a richer understanding of how meaning is constructed in technologically mediated work and emphasize that adaptation is as much existential as it is procedural. This study broadens theoretical and practical insight into the human dimensions of engineering practice, underscoring the need for human-centered strategies in digital transformation initiatives and offering a conceptual foundation for future interdisciplinary research on lived technological experience.

Article Details

Section

Articles

References

Abdelfattah, F., Madi, H., Al-Washahi, M., AlAraimi, A., Negi, S., & Abbas, M. (2025). Harnessing Artificial Intelligence, Business Intelligence, and Digital Technologies for achieving supply chain excellence in Oman: Investigating the mediating role of predictive analytics. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 11(4). Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joitmc.2025.100644

Bender, S. (2025). Generative-AI, the media industries, and the disappearance of human creative labour. Media Practice and Education, 26(2), 200–217. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1080/25741136.2024.2355597

Carreiras, H., & Castro, C. (2012). Qualitative methods in military studies: Research experiences and challenges (p. 194). Taylor and Francis; Scopus. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203099223

Chen, S., Vermol, V. V., & Ahmad, H. (2024). Exploring the Evolution and Challenges of Digital Media in the Cultural Value of Dunhuang Frescoes. Journal of Ecohumanism, 3(5), 1369–1376. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.62754/joe.v3i5.3973

Daly, K. J. (2007). Qualitative methods for family studies & human development (p. 293). SAGE Publications Inc.; Scopus. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452224800

Fife, W. (2020). Counting as a Qualitative Method: Grappling with the Reliability Issue in Ethnographic Research (p. 140). Springer International Publishing; Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-34803-8

Ge, Y., Wang, H., Cheah, K. S. L., & Taha, A. Z. B. (2025). Examining the role of social media in fostering responsible consumption: Insights from Bitcoin Adoption trends (2015–2023). Cleaner and Responsible Consumption, 17. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clrc.2025.100266

Gerchen, A. (2024). Finding digital solutions in pandemic times: The case of appointment procedures for professors at German universities. Higher Education, 87(6), 1657–1675. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-023-01083-z

He, Z., Chen, M., & Gu, D. (2025). How digital village construction affects to the effectiveness of rural governance? —Research on the NCA and QCA methods. Cities, 156. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2024.105514

Hillman, W., & Radel, K. (2018). Qualitative methods in tourism research: Theory and practice (p. 294). Channel View Publications; Scopus. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85050434848&partnerID=40&md5=7ea1e3f0b2027993b53f6a795804ee51

Iosifides, T. (2016). Qualitative Methods in Migration Studies: A Critical Realist Perspective (p. 266). Taylor and Francis; Scopus. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315603124

Jardim, J. (2021). Entrepreneurial skills to be successful in the global and digital world: Proposal for a frame of reference for entrepreneurial education. Education Sciences, 11(7). Scopus. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11070356

Kang, S., & Shang, Y. (2025). How artificial intelligence drives industrial digitalization and greening synergies? Evidence from China’s AI innovation and development pilot zones. Technology in Society, 83. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2025.103011

Karakose, T., Polat, H., & Papadakis, S. (2021). Examining teachers’ perspectives on school principals’ digital leadership roles and technology capabilities during the covid-19 pandemic. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(23). Scopus. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132313448

Kawamura, Y. (2020). DOING RESEARCH IN FASHION AND DRESS: An Introduction to Qualitative Methods, 2nd edition (p. 166). Bloomsbury Publishing Plc.; Scopus. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85188589040&partnerID=40&md5=b3db406659cd1ea5b20e05664bec39a3

Kele, K., & Mzileni, P. (2021). Higher education leadership responses applied in two south african comprehensive universities during the covid-19 pandemic: A critical discourse analysis. Transformation in Higher Education, 6. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.4102/the.v6i0.114

Khwebulana, C., & Naidoo, G. M. (2024). How Did Fact-Checking Help Mitigate the Social Phenomenon of Fake News During COVID-19? A Desktop Study. Journal of African Films and Diaspora Studies, 7(3), 87–108. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.31920/2516-2713/2023/7n3a5

Longhofer, J., Floersch, J., & Hoy, J. (2012). Qualitative Methods for Practice Research (p. 224). Oxford University Press; Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195398472.001.0001

Lugo-Morin, D. R. (2025). Exploring the Impact of the Digital Economy on Rural Mexico. Agricultural and Rural Studies, 3(3). Scopus. https://doi.org/10.59978/ar03030014

Lutz, W., & Knox, S. (2014). Quantitative and qualitative methods in psychotherapy research (p. 448). Taylor and Francis; Scopus. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203386071

McNabb, D. E. (2015). Research methods for political science: Quantitative and qualitative methods: Second edition (p. 426). Taylor and Francis; Scopus. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315701141

Migdal, A. B. (2018). Qualitative Methods in Quantum Theory (p. 460). CRC Press; Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1201/9780429497940

Mukhlis, L. (2025a). A Phenomenological Study of Personal Spiritual Experiences in Navigating Religious Pluralism within Interfaith Communities. Irfana: Journal of Religious Studies, 1(6), 212–220.

Mukhlis, L. (2025b). Spiritual Grounds for Economic Growth: A Qualitative Exploration of Rural Indonesian Women’s Transformative Journeys Through Mosque-Led Empowerment Programs. Servina: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat, 1(8), 289–298.

Mukhlis, L., & Abdullah, M. N. (2025). Hukum Keluarga Islam di Indonesia (1st ed.). Mukhlisina Revolution Center.

Mukhlis, L., Arifin, T., Ridwan, A. H., & Zulbaidah. (2024). Integrating Artificial Intelligenceand Maqāṣid al-Syarī‘ah: Revolutionizing Indonesia’s Sharia Online Trading System. Computer Fraud and Security, 2024(11), 301–309. https://doi.org/10.52710/cfs.238

Mukhlis, L., Arifin, T., Ridwan, A. H., & Zulbaidah. (2025). Reorientation of Sharia Stock Regulations: Integrating Taṣarrufāt al-Rasūl and Maqāṣid al-Sharī‘ah for Justice and Sustainability. Journal of Information Systems Engineering and Management, 10(10s), 58–66. https://doi.org/10.52783/jisem.v10i10s.1341

Mukhlis, L., Arifin, T., Ridwan, A. H., Zulbaidah, Rosadi, A., & Solehudin, E. (2025). Reformulation of Islamic Stock Law: The Application of Taṣarrufāt al-Rasūl and Maqāṣid al-Syarī‘ahto Develop a Dynamic and Sustainable Islamic Capital Market in Indonesia. Journal of Posthumanism, 5(3), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.63332/joph.v5i3.913

Mukhlis, L., Janwari, Y., & Syafe`i, R. (2023). INDONESIA STOCK EXCHANGE: THEORETICAL AND PHILOSOPHICAL ANALYSIS OF MUDHARABAH AND MUSYARAKAH CONTRACTS. Yurisprudentia: Jurnal Hukum Ekonomi, 9(2), 243–264. https://doi.org/10.24952/yurisprudentia.v9i2.8466

Mukhlis, L., Maryam, S., & Sormin, S. A. (2023). Model Pembelajaran Living History Berbasis PjBL Untuk Meningkatkan Keterampilan Histografi Mahasiswa. Jurnal Educatio FKIP UNMA, 9(4), 1800–1809. https://doi.org/10.31949/educatio.v9i4.5595

Mukhlis, L., & Saidah, Y. (2025). Dynamics of Nature-Based learning in Developing Children’s Motoricic Skills: Teacher and Parent Perspectives. HUMANISMA: Journal of Gender Studies, 9(1), 64–79. http://dx.doi.org/10.30983/humanisme.v4i2.9366

Mukhlis, L., Suradi, Janwari, Y., & Syafe`i, R. (2023). Sosialisasi Saham Syariah sebagai Instrumen Pengembangan Ekonomi Masyarakat di Badan Kontak Majelis Taklim (BKMT) Kabupaten Mandailing Natal. Jurnal Pengabdian Multidisiplin, 3(2), 2–9. https://doi.org/10.51214/japamul.v3i2.604

Osei, A. (2025). Exploring the governance–digital transformation nexus: Empirical evidence on sustainability reporting using 2SLS, LSDV models, heterogeneity effects, and cluster analysis. Cogent Business and Management, 12(1). Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2025.2491686

Resmadi, I. (2022). From music industry to content industry: A story of Sun Eater Records. Emerald Emerging Markets Case Studies, 12(3), 1–42. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1108/EEMCS-12-2021-0414

Rohmy, A. M., & Nihayaty, A. I. (2023). Green Economy Policies in the Digital Transformation of Forest Management in Indonesia. Environmental Policy and Law, 53(4), 289–302. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.3233/EPL-230026

Schulz, K. A., Gstrein, O. J., & Zwitter, A. J. (2020). Exploring the governance and implementation of sustainable development initiatives through blockchain technology. Futures, 122. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2020.102611

Shao, D., & Marwa, N. (2025). Examining the role of artificial intelligence in post-harvest management for enhanced food security: A critical review. Sustainable Futures, 10. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sftr.2025.101286

Ujiyanto, E. (2025). Exploring the Experiences and Perceptions of Policymakers on Digital Transformation in Public Governance Indonesia. Hukmuna: Journal of Law and Policy, 1(4), 153–161. https://journals.ai-mrc.com/hukmuna/article/view/277

Umbach, G., & Tkalec, I. (2022). Evaluating -governance through e-government: Practices and challenges of assessing the digitalisation of public governmental services. Evaluation and Program Planning, 93. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2022.102118

van Noordt, C., & Misuraca, G. (2022). Exploratory Insights on Artificial Intelligence for Government in Europe. Social Science Computer Review, 40(2), 426–444. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439320980449

Wang, H., Tan, X., & Li, M. (2025). Extreme climate attention and corporate energy innovation: Empirical evidence from China. Energy Economics, 148. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2025.108681