Exploring the Lived Experiences and Subjective Adaptation Strategies to Climate Change in Rural and Urban Communities
Main Article Content
Abstract
Climate change is a global phenomenon that impacts various environmental, social, and economic systems. While much of the existing research focuses on the physical and economic impacts of climate change, less attention has been given to understanding how individuals and communities perceive and experience these changes on a subjective level. This study addresses the gap in the literature by exploring the lived experiences of individuals in rural and urban communities, focusing on how they perceive and adapt to climate change. Using a phenomenological approach, this research aims to capture the essence of these experiences and provides insights into the personal and social dimensions of climate change. Data was collected through in-depth interviews with 20 participants from rural and urban areas, analyzing their responses thematically to uncover key themes of perception, adaptation, and policy engagement. The findings reveal a stark contrast between rural and urban communities, with rural participants more directly engaged with the immediate impacts of climate change, while urban participants view it more abstractly and rely on governmental interventions. These findings have important implications for policy development, highlighting the need for context-specific climate adaptation policies that consider both rural and urban experiences. Policymakers should prioritize participatory strategies that empower local communities to take ownership of climate adaptation initiatives. Additionally, practical recommendations include the integration of community-based adaptation programs that foster resilience and encourage proactive engagement. These findings contribute to a deeper understanding of the human experience of climate change, suggesting the need for more context-specific and participatory climate adaptation strategies. Future research should explore the role of local governance in facilitating these strategies and evaluate the effectiveness of such participatory approaches in building long-term climate resilience.
Article Details
Section
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Alfi, C. F., Mohamad, M., & Hussainey, K. (2025). Unveiling the hidden symphony: Board dynamics and carbon emission disclosure – a meta-analysis study in the realm of developed markets. Journal of Accounting Literature, 47(2), 404–432. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAL-07-2023-0126
Carreiras, H., & Castro, C. (2012). Qualitative methods in military studies: Research experiences and challenges (p. 194). Taylor and Francis; Scopus. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203099223
Crosson, J. B. (2024). The Subterranean Unsettling of Science, Race, and Religion: Obeah, Petroleum Geology, and Risk in Trinidad. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 66(3), 501–527. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0010417524000033
Daly, K. J. (2007). Qualitative methods for family studies & human development (p. 293). SAGE Publications Inc.; Scopus. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452224800
Delina, L. L. (2025). What’s holding us back? Unpacking perceived barriers to the transition to renewable energy in vulnerable Philippine communities. Energy Research and Social Science, 127. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2025.104314
Duc, T. M. (2025). The Spread of Forest Protection Awareness: An Anthropological Study on the Influence of Writer Nguyen Ngoc on the Central Highlands Community, Vietnam. Journal of People, Plants, and Environment, 28(3), 359–373. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.11628/ksppe.2025.28.3.359
Fernandez-Bou, A. S., Rodríguez-Flores, J. M., Guzman, A., Ortiz-Partida, J. P., Classen-Rodriguez, L. M., Sánchez-Pérez, P. A., Valero-Fandiño, J., Pells, C., Flores-Landeros, H., Sandoval-Solís, S., Characklis, G. W., Harmon, T. C., McCullough, M., & Medellín-Azuara, J. (2023). Water, environment, and socioeconomic justice in California: A multi-benefit cropland repurposing framework. Science of the Total Environment, 858. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.159963
Fife, W. (2020). Counting as a Qualitative Method: Grappling with the Reliability Issue in Ethnographic Research (p. 140). Springer International Publishing; Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-34803-8
Gannon, K. E., Eskander, S. M. S. U., Avila-Uribe, A., Castellano, E., Diop, M., & Agol, D. (2025). The role of gender in firm-level climate change adaptation behaviour: Insights from small businesses in Senegal and Kenya. Climate Risk Management, 48. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crm.2025.100699
Gössling, S., & Schweiggart, N. (2022). Two years of COVID-19 and tourism: What we learned, and what we should have learned. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 30(4), 915–931. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2022.2029872
Gupta, N., & Miah, P. (2024). Imbalances in the oral health workforce: A Canadian population-based study. BMC Health Services Research, 24(1). Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-024-11677-7
Hillman, W., & Radel, K. (2018). Qualitative methods in tourism research: Theory and practice (p. 294). Channel View Publications; Scopus. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85050434848&partnerID=40&md5=7ea1e3f0b2027993b53f6a795804ee51
Iosifides, T. (2016). Qualitative Methods in Migration Studies: A Critical Realist Perspective (p. 266). Taylor and Francis; Scopus. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315603124
Kahomwe, L., & Muzingili, T. (2025). Impact of climate change disasters on access to education and coping mechanisms for rural learners in Zimbabwe. Cogent Education, 12(1). Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2025.2517505
Kawamura, Y. (2020). DOING RESEARCH IN FASHION AND DRESS: An Introduction to Qualitative Methods, 2nd edition (p. 166). Bloomsbury Publishing Plc.; Scopus. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85188589040&partnerID=40&md5=b3db406659cd1ea5b20e05664bec39a3
Kuhn, C., Warui, M., Kimani, D., & Oyewale, F. (2025). Imagining the Future of the Dairy Industry: A Participatory Human-Centred Approach to Policy Making for Rural Communities in Kenya. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 26(3), 505–516. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1080/19452829.2025.2518587
Longhofer, J., Floersch, J., & Hoy, J. (2012). Qualitative Methods for Practice Research (p. 224). Oxford University Press; Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195398472.001.0001
Lutz, W., & Knox, S. (2014). Quantitative and qualitative methods in psychotherapy research (p. 448). Taylor and Francis; Scopus. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203386071
McNabb, D. E. (2015). Research methods for political science: Quantitative and qualitative methods: Second edition (p. 426). Taylor and Francis; Scopus. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315701141
Migdal, A. B. (2018). Qualitative Methods in Quantum Theory (p. 460). CRC Press; Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1201/9780429497940
Naheed, S. (2024). Transitioning to sustainable food systems in a changing climate and gender equality: A brief review. Agriculture and Food Security, 13(1). Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40066-024-00492-2
Nipa, F., Lino, A. F., & Arun, T. (2025). Third-Sector Organizations as Intermediaries in Climate Action: Engaging Vulnerable Communities in Co-Production in Bangladesh. Governance, 38(4). Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.70058
Ota, M., van Onselen, V. M., Lin, W. J., Pratiwi, E. S., Nazibudin, N. A., Hussin, N. S. C., & Manaf, L. A. (2025). Investigating participant learning through international joint fieldwork: Implications from a study program on local sustainability in Nagasaki Prefecture, Japan. Discover Sustainability, 6(1). Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-025-01577-z
Otiniano León, M. Y., Arbulú Ballesteros, M. A., Ramos Farroñán, E. V., & Paredes Morales, A. E. (2025). Impact of University Social Responsibility on Strengthening Sustainable Rural Women’s Entrepreneurship: Multigroup Analysis Based on the SEM. Sustainability (Switzerland), 17(13). Scopus. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17135969
Parthasarathy, D., Srivastava, S., Mehta, L., Bose, S., & Movik, S. (2025). Transformation in the context of uncertainty and compounding effects: Insights from marginal environments in India and Bangladesh. Global Environmental Change, 93. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2025.103025
Picó, M.-J., & Sáez-Soro, E. (2025). Videogames, Art and Co-Creation for Climate Communication: A Social Innovation Experience. Revista Mediterranea de Comunicacion, 16(2). Scopus. https://doi.org/10.14198/MEDCOM.29316
Prana, A. M., Curl, A., Dionisio, M. R., Gomez, C., Hart, D., Apriyanto, H., & Prasetya, H. (2024). Urban planning approaches to support community-based flood adaptation in North Jakarta Kampungs. Disaster Prevention and Management, 33(4), 383–405. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1108/DPM-05-2023-0114
Price, H. (2021). Weathering fluctuations in teacher commitment: Leaders relational failures, with improvement prospects. Journal of Educational Administration, 59(4), 493–513. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-07-2020-0157
Rayamajhee, V., & Paudel, J. (2024). The social behavior of immigrants during natural disasters: Lessons from the United States. Journal of Comparative Economics, 52(3), 614–633. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jce.2024.06.005
Rosalina, P. D., Wardika, I. W., & Bestari, N. M. P. (2024). Indonesian Tourism Village Award: Impact, Strategy, and Potential for Integrated Rural Tourism in Bali. Jurnal Kajian Bali, 14(2), 423–448. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.24843/JKB.2024.v14.i02.p06
Savaresi, A. (2025). Verein KlimaSeniorinnen Schweiz and Others v Switzerland: Making climate change litigation history. Review of European, Comparative and International Environmental Law, 34(1), 279–287. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1111/reel.12612
Setiawati, R., Noviarita, H., Haryanto, S., Anshori, A., & Dwianto, A. (2024). Islamic Community Empowerment in Economic Growth through Sugar Cane Farming Partnerships. Qubahan Academic Journal, 4(3), 579–606. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.48161/qaj.v4n3a993
Setyawati, D. (2021). Injustice and environmental harm in extractive industries and solar energy policies in Indonesia. International Journal for Crime, Justice and Social Democracy, 10(2). Scopus. https://doi.org/10.5204/IJCJSD.1975
Shaffer, J. D., Stojicic, P., McCormick, D., Cruz, A. K., Ahmmad, Z., & Basu, G. (2025). Training clinicians to be organizers: Expanding professional identities through a year-long Climate Health Organizing Fellowship. Social Science and Medicine, 381. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.118278
Shoaib, M., Qadeer, N., Zámečník, R., Javed, M., & Nawal, A. (2025). Towards a greener tomorrow: Investigating the nexus of GHRM, technology innovation, and employee green behavior in driving sustainable performance. Cogent Business and Management, 12(1). Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2024.2442095
Sofyan, J., Sudyana, I. N., Berkat, n., Santoso, M., Adji, F. F., Alpian, u., Lautt, B. S., Rotinsulu, J. M., & Rahayu, D. T. (2025). The role of stakeholders and AI-based city forest management strategies in increasing public awareness of city forest ecosystem services and its implications for the success of the ecotourism program. International Journal of Data and Network Science, 9(4), 1193–1206. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.ijdns.2024.8.024
Syamsu, S., Ansar, M. C., & Nurlinah, n. (2025). Impact of class configuration on political participation: Evidence from Gowa Regency, Indonesia. Frontiers in Political Science, 7. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpos.2025.1544614
Ul Haq, I. U., Naeem, M. A., Huo, C., & Bakry, W. (2025). Unveiling time-frequency linkages among diverse cryptocurrency classes and climate change concerns. International Review of Economics and Finance, 99. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2025.104064
Weerman, F., Arcuri, A., & Bisschop, L. (2022). Using the law to save the planet: Legal options to address climate change and ecological destruction. Erasmus Law Review, 2022(3), 137–141. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.5553/ELR.000243
Wood, K., Giesbrecht, C. J., Brooks, C., & Arisman, K. (2025). “I Couldn’t Leave the Farm”: Rural Women’s Experiences of Intimate Partner Violence and Coercive Control. Violence Against Women, 31(12–13), 3330–3354. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1177/10778012241279117