A Phenomenological Exploration of Social Media Users’ Lived Experiences in Interpreting Digital Political Discourse within Their Cultural Contexts
Main Article Content
Abstract
The rapid growth of digital media has transformed the landscape of political communication, with social media platforms now playing a central role in shaping public discourse. However, while much research has focused on the structural and content-based aspects of digital political discourse, little has been done to explore the subjective experiences of individuals engaging with political messages online. This gap in understanding raises important questions about how personal and cultural factors influence the interpretation of political messages in digital spaces. In this study, we employ a phenomenological approach to examine how individuals interpret political content on social media and the role of their cultural backgrounds in shaping these interpretations. Specifically, this research adopts an interpretive phenomenological design aimed at capturing participants’ lived experiences (Erlebnis) in encountering and making sense of digital political messages. Data were collected through in-depth, semi-structured interviews with 12 participants from diverse cultural backgrounds. The analysis followed a phenomenological procedure involving iterative reading, meaning-unit identification, thematic clustering, and interpretive synthesis to uncover the essence of participants’ shared and divergent experiences. Rather than measuring attitudes quantitatively, this approach foregrounds how meaning is constructed, negotiated, and embedded within everyday digital practices. Through this process, we identify two key findings: digital platforms' personalized content reinforces pre-existing beliefs, and cultural context significantly shapes how political messages are understood. The analysis reveals that participants' interactions with political content are influenced by both the algorithmic curation of content and their personal cultural frames of reference. By centering participants’ lived narratives and interpretive reflections, the study uncovers how algorithmic structures intersect with culturally embedded meaning-making processes. These results provide a deeper, more holistic understanding of how political messages are experienced in the digital age, addressing the limitations of previous studies that have focused primarily on content and structural aspects. Our findings contribute to the growing body of literature on digital political discourse by demonstrating the value of phenomenology as a methodological lens for examining the experiential dimension of digital political engagement, highlighting the importance of considering cultural context in media studies. Future research could expand on these findings by exploring how diverse audiences engage with political content across different digital platforms.
Article Details
Section

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Aytaç, S. E. (2021). Effectiveness of Incumbent’s Strategic Communication during Economic Crisis under Electoral Authoritarianism: Evidence from Turkey. American Political Science Review, 115(4), 1517–1523. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055421000587
Bene, M., & Szabó, G. (2021). Discovered and Undiscovered Fields of Digital Politics: Mapping Online Political Communication and Online News Media Literature in Hungary. Intersections East European Journal of Society and Politics, 7(1), 1–21. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.17356/ieejsp.v7i1.868
Blanckaert, B. (2025). Crossing the Rubicon: Strategies and Motivations behind Cross-ethnolinguistic Vote-seeking in the Brussels Capital Region. Ethnopolitics, 24(4), 382–404. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449057.2024.2322868
Canalp, G., & Arsoy, A. (2025). Echoes of home: Turkish Cypriot IDPs and home perception in the context of ruins. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 12(1). Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-05822-8
Carreiras, H., & Castro, C. (2012). Qualitative methods in military studies: Research experiences and challenges (p. 194). Taylor and Francis; Scopus. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203099223
Daly, K. J. (2007). Qualitative methods for family studies & human development (p. 293). SAGE Publications Inc.; Scopus. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452224800
Dolea, A., Ingenhoff, D., & Beju, A. (2021). Country images and identities in times of populism: Swiss media discourses on the ‘stop mass immigration’ initiative. International Communication Gazette, 83(4), 301–325. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1177/1748048520913462
Fife, W. (2020). Counting as a Qualitative Method: Grappling with the Reliability Issue in Ethnographic Research (p. 140). Springer International Publishing; Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-34803-8
Haenschen, K., Shu, M. X., & Gilliland, J. A. (2024). Curated Misinformation: Liking Facebook Pages for Fake News Sites. American Behavioral Scientist, 68(10), 1290–1307. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1177/00027642231175638
Hameleers, M., & Minihold, S. (2022). Constructing Discourses on (Un)truthfulness: Attributions of Reality, Misinformation, and Disinformation by Politicians in a Comparative Social Media Setting. Communication Research, 49(8), 1176–1199. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650220982762
Heryanto, G. G., Zamroni, M., & Astuti, Y. D. (2024). Disinformation Unveiled: Tracking Media Hoaxes to Build Public Literacy for Indonesia’s 2024 Elections. Studies in Media and Communication, 12(4), 28–40. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.11114/smc.v12i4.6931
Hillman, W., & Radel, K. (2018). Qualitative methods in tourism research: Theory and practice (p. 294). Channel View Publications; Scopus. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85050434848&partnerID=40&md5=7ea1e3f0b2027993b53f6a795804ee51
Innes, M., Dobreva, D., & Innes, H. (2021). Disinformation and digital influencing after terrorism: Spoofing, truthing and social proofing. Contemporary Social Science, 16(2), 241–255. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1080/21582041.2019.1569714
Iosifides, T. (2016). Qualitative Methods in Migration Studies: A Critical Realist Perspective (p. 266). Taylor and Francis; Scopus. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315603124
Kawamura, Y. (2020). DOING RESEARCH IN FASHION AND DRESS: An Introduction to Qualitative Methods, 2nd edition (p. 166). Bloomsbury Publishing Plc.; Scopus. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85188589040&partnerID=40&md5=b3db406659cd1ea5b20e05664bec39a3
Lin, C. (2024). Digital propaganda is not simply propaganda in digital garb: Toward an expanded theory of propaganda. Communication Theory, 34(4), 205–215. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1093/ct/qtae017
Longhofer, J., Floersch, J., & Hoy, J. (2012). Qualitative Methods for Practice Research (p. 224). Oxford University Press; Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195398472.001.0001
Lukito, J. (2020). Coordinating a Multi-Platform Disinformation Campaign: Internet Research Agency Activity on Three U.S. Social Media Platforms, 2015 to 2017. Political Communication, 37(2), 238–255. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2019.1661889
Lutz, W., & Knox, S. (2014). Quantitative and qualitative methods in psychotherapy research (p. 448). Taylor and Francis; Scopus. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203386071
Madebo, A. (2024). Digital Diaspora and Nationhood: Sociotechnical Imaginaries and Practices of Nationhood. International Journal of Communication, 18, 777–783. Scopus. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85188565499&partnerID=40&md5=64e0df8c3fbc323a74feff2732c779bb
McNabb, D. E. (2015). Research methods for political science: Quantitative and qualitative methods: Second edition (p. 426). Taylor and Francis; Scopus. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315701141
Migdal, A. B. (2018). Qualitative Methods in Quantum Theory (p. 460). CRC Press; Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1201/9780429497940
Moreno-Díaz, J. (2025). Electoral trends and strategies on Instagram: Evolution and analysis of political communication in the 2023 Community of Madrid elections. Doxa Comunicacion, 2025-July-December(41), 143–170. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.31921/doxacom.n41a2547
Mukhlis, L. (2025a). A Phenomenological Study of Personal Spiritual Experiences in Navigating Religious Pluralism within Interfaith Communities. Irfana: Journal of Religious Studies, 1(6), 212–220.
Mukhlis, L. (2025b). Spiritual Grounds for Economic Growth: A Qualitative Exploration of Rural Indonesian Women’s Transformative Journeys Through Mosque-Led Empowerment Programs. Servina: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat, 1(8), 289–298.
Mukhlis, L., & Abdullah, M. N. (2025). Hukum Keluarga Islam di Indonesia (1st ed.). Mukhlisina Revolution Center.
Mukhlis, L., Arifin, T., Ridwan, A. H., & Zulbaidah. (2024). Integrating Artificial Intelligenceand Maqāṣid al-Syarī‘ah: Revolutionizing Indonesia’s Sharia Online Trading System. Computer Fraud and Security, 2024(11), 301–309. https://doi.org/10.52710/cfs.238
Mukhlis, L., Arifin, T., Ridwan, A. H., & Zulbaidah. (2025). Reorientation of Sharia Stock Regulations: Integrating Taṣarrufāt al-Rasūl and Maqāṣid al-Sharī‘ah for Justice and Sustainability. Journal of Information Systems Engineering and Management, 10(10s), 58–66. https://doi.org/10.52783/jisem.v10i10s.1341
Mukhlis, L., Arifin, T., Ridwan, A. H., Zulbaidah, Rosadi, A., & Solehudin, E. (2025). Reformulation of Islamic Stock Law: The Application of Taṣarrufāt al-Rasūl and Maqāṣid al-Syarī‘ahto Develop a Dynamic and Sustainable Islamic Capital Market in Indonesia. Journal of Posthumanism, 5(3), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.63332/joph.v5i3.913
Mukhlis, L., Janwari, Y., & Syafe`i, R. (2023). INDONESIA STOCK EXCHANGE: THEORETICAL AND PHILOSOPHICAL ANALYSIS OF MUDHARABAH AND MUSYARAKAH CONTRACTS. Yurisprudentia: Jurnal Hukum Ekonomi, 9(2), 243–264. https://doi.org/10.24952/yurisprudentia.v9i2.8466
Mukhlis, L., Maryam, S., & Sormin, S. A. (2023). Model Pembelajaran Living History Berbasis PjBL Untuk Meningkatkan Keterampilan Histografi Mahasiswa. Jurnal Educatio FKIP UNMA, 9(4), 1800–1809. https://doi.org/10.31949/educatio.v9i4.5595
Mukhlis, L., & Saidah, Y. (2025). Dynamics of Nature-Based learning in Developing Children’s Motoricic Skills: Teacher and Parent Perspectives. HUMANISMA: Journal of Gender Studies, 9(1), 64–79. http://dx.doi.org/10.30983/humanisme.v4i2.9366
Mukhlis, L., Suradi, Janwari, Y., & Syafe`i, R. (2023). Sosialisasi Saham Syariah sebagai Instrumen Pengembangan Ekonomi Masyarakat di Badan Kontak Majelis Taklim (BKMT) Kabupaten Mandailing Natal. Jurnal Pengabdian Multidisiplin, 3(2), 2–9. https://doi.org/10.51214/japamul.v3i2.604
Mulligan, C., Kumar, S. G., & Berti, G. (2025). Community-Based Resilience: Digital technologies for living within Planetary Boundaries. Technology in Society, 82. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2025.102915
Ong, J. C., & Tapsell, R. (2022). Demystifying disinformation shadow economies: Fake news work models in Indonesia and the Philippines. Asian Journal of Communication, 32(3), 251–267. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1080/01292986.2021.1971270
Patria, N., Irawanto, B., & Abrar, A. N. (2025). “(Don’t) Stop the Rising Oil Price”: Mediatization, Digital Discourse, and Fuel Price Controversies in Indonesian Online Media. Journalism and Media, 6(3). Scopus. https://doi.org/10.3390/journalmedia6030124
Pimonenko, T., Lyulyov, O., & Us, Y. (2025). Country Green Brand Promotion: A Sentiment Analysis. Forum Scientiae Oeconomia, 13(2), 27–51. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.23762/FSO_VOL13_NO2_2
Salamon, E., & Xie, H. (2025). Communicative intersectionality: Advocating for equality, diversity, and inclusion in media industries. Communication Theory, 35(3), 185–196. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1093/ct/qtaf008
Tiep Le, T., Ngo, H. Q., & Aureliano-Silva, L. (2023). Contribution of corporate social responsibility on SMEs’ performance in an emerging market – the mediating roles of brand trust and brand loyalty. International Journal of Emerging Markets, 18(8), 1868–1891. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOEM-12-2020-1516
Xue, Y., & Burnham, J. (2025). Convergence Fuels Divergence: How Emotions Lead to Intensified U.S.-China Confrontation. Asia Policy, 20(2), 77–100. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1353/asp.2025.a960044