Phenomenological Study of Engineers' Experiences in Designing Control Systems for Robotics

Main Article Content

Don E. D. G. Pollo

Abstract

While robotics has advanced significantly—particularly in the development of control systems—existing studies predominantly emphasize technical dimensions, overlooking engineers' lived experiences. This study fills that gap by using a phenomenological approach to explore how engineers experience and interpret the development of robotic control systems. Through interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA), we examine the emotional, social, and professional dimensions that influence engineering practices. Findings reveal key challenges such as technical precision, team collaboration, and emotional responses to system failures—factors that significantly shape engineers’ professional growth. This study contributes to a more human-centered understanding of robotics development and emphasizes the importance of addressing emotional resilience and team dynamics in high-tech engineering environments.

Article Details

Section

Articles

References

Ahearne, M., Haumann, T., Rainbird, M., & Van Vaerenbergh, Y. (2020). The Role of Emotions in Technology-Driven Service Encounters: A Review and Research Agenda. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 48(3), 371–393. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-019-00678-9

Bennett, D., & McWhorter, R. (2016). Opening the Black Box: A Phenomenological Approach to Understanding Technology Implementation. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406915624578

Blanchard, P., & Fabry, M. (2021). Collaborative Engineering Practices in Robotics: Bridging Cross-Disciplinary Workflows. IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 37(4), 1329–1341. https://doi.org/10.1109/TRO.2021.3084721

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2019). Reflecting on Reflexive Thematic Analysis. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 11(4), 589–597. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2019.1628806

Chen, X., & Huang, Y. (2020). Human–Robot Collaboration: A Review of Factors Affecting Operator Trust. IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems, 50(6), 500–509. https://doi.org/10.1109/THMS.2020.3010402

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Fang, Y., Zhang, J., & Luo, R. C. (2021). Design and Evaluation of Human-Aware Control Strategies in Robotics. IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, 26(3), 1420–1430. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMECH.2021.3050114

Finlay, L. (2014). Engaging Phenomenological Analysis. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 11(2), 121–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2013.807899

Gonzalez, J., & Ahmad, F. (2022). Emotional Dynamics in Technical Teams: A Phenomenological Approach. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 63, 101682. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jengtecman.2022.101682

Kaipa, K. N., & Albus, J. S. (2017). Control Architectures for Human-Centered Robotics. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 91, 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.robot.2016.11.005

Leung, M., & Zakaria, N. (2020). Multidisciplinary Team Collaboration in Engineering Projects: Insights from a Grounded Theory Approach. Journal of Engineering Education, 109(1), 125–145. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20295

Politis, D. (2020). Phenomenological Insights into Engineers’ Experiences of Innovation. Technovation, 96-97, 102127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2020.102127

Salas, E., Reyes, D. L., & McDaniel, S. H. (2018). The Science of Teamwork: Progress, Reflections, and the Road Ahead. American Psychologist, 73(4), 593–600. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000330

Van Manen, M. (2016). Researching Lived Experience: Human Science for an Action Sensitive Pedagogy (2nd ed.). Routledge.

Wilson, R. E., & Sauser, W. I. (2021). Emotional Resilience and Decision-Making in Engineering Teams. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 59, 101610. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jengtecman.2021.101610