Investigating Consumer Perceptions of Quality and Safety in Herbal Medicine
Main Article Content
Abstract
Herbal medicine consumption has become increasingly popular due to its perceived natural benefits, yet concerns regarding product safety and quality remain prevalent. While various studies have examined consumer behavior towards herbal products, few have delved into the subjective experiences that shape consumer perceptions of these products' quality and safety. A significant gap in the literature lies in understanding how these subjective perceptions influence consumer decision-making and trust in herbal medicine. In this study, we employ a phenomenological approach to explore the lived experiences of consumers regarding the quality and safety of herbal medicines, aiming to answer the question: how do consumers perceive the quality and safety of herbal products in the marketplace? Through in-depth, semi-structured interviews with 12 herbal medicine consumers, we identify key themes related to the role of packaging, labeling, traditional knowledge, and regulatory standards in shaping perceptions. Thematic analysis revealed that consumers’ perceptions were influenced by their views on product labeling, packaging, the integration of traditional knowledge, and the importance of regulatory standards. These themes directly relate to the research question by offering insights into how consumers differentiate between product quality and safety based on these factors. Our findings reveal that consumers rely heavily on visible indicators of product quality, such as labeling and packaging, while balancing trust in traditional knowledge with concerns over scientific validation and regulation. These insights contribute to a deeper understanding of how subjective factors influence consumer behavior and trust in herbal products. The study’s implications highlight the need for clearer labeling and better regulation in the herbal medicine industry, offering directions for future research on consumer health product perceptions.
Article Details
Section

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Abahuje, E., Bartuska, A., Koch, R., Youngson, G., Ntakiyiruta, G., Williams, W., Dias, R. D., Rosu, C., Yule, S., & Riviello, R. (2021). Understanding Barriers and Facilitators to Behavior Change After Implementation of an Interdisciplinary Surgical Non-Technical Skills Training Program in Rwanda. Journal of Surgical Education, 78(5), 1618–1628. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2021.01.011
Amado-Mateus, M., Guzmán-Rincón, A., & Ortega-Almonacid, F. D. (2025). Understanding online repurchase intention among young Colombian consumers: A relationship-based approach. Digital Business, 5(2). Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.digbus.2025.100146
Bai, S., Cao, L., & Zhou, J. (2025). When Positive Service Logistics Encounter Enhanced Purchase Intention: The Reverse Moderating Effect of Image–Text Similarity. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 20(3). Scopus. https://doi.org/10.3390/jtaer20030220
Baldick, H., & Jang, S. S. (2025). Tricked into booking? The hidden influence of dark patterns on boutique hotel bookings. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 131. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2025.104304
Carreiras, H., & Castro, C. (2012). Qualitative methods in military studies: Research experiences and challenges (p. 194). Taylor and Francis; Scopus. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203099223
Coldron, B. C., la Diega, G. N., Twigg-Flesner, C., Busch, C., Stolte, T., & de Vries, M.-O. (2025). When the Internet Gets Under Our Skin: Reassessing Consumer Law and Policy in a Society of Cyborgs. Journal of Consumer Policy, 48(3), 205–232. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10603-024-09581-y
Daly, K. J. (2007). Qualitative methods for family studies & human development (p. 293). SAGE Publications Inc.; Scopus. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452224800
Eales, J., Bethel, A., Fullam, J., Olmesdahl, S., Wulandari, P., & Garside, R. (2021). What is the evidence documenting the effects of marine or coastal nature conservation or natural resource management activities on human well-being in South East Asia? A systematic map. Environment International, 151. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2021.106397
Errmann, A., & Arango, L. (2025). When suffering hurts more: Suffering for material products reduces intrinsic motivation, well-being, and repurchase intention compared to experiences. Journal of Business Research, 199. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115506
Fife, W. (2020). Counting as a Qualitative Method: Grappling with the Reliability Issue in Ethnographic Research (p. 140). Springer International Publishing; Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-34803-8
Hillman, W., & Radel, K. (2018). Qualitative methods in tourism research: Theory and practice (p. 294). Channel View Publications; Scopus. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85050434848&partnerID=40&md5=7ea1e3f0b2027993b53f6a795804ee51
Iosifides, T. (2016). Qualitative Methods in Migration Studies: A Critical Realist Perspective (p. 266). Taylor and Francis; Scopus. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315603124
Kawamura, Y. (2020). DOING RESEARCH IN FASHION AND DRESS: An Introduction to Qualitative Methods, 2nd edition (p. 166). Bloomsbury Publishing Plc.; Scopus. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85188589040&partnerID=40&md5=b3db406659cd1ea5b20e05664bec39a3
Kim, S., Son, H., Kim, S., Lee, Y., & Lee, Y. (2025). Toward inclusivity through fashion: A qualitative exploration of the clothing consumption experiences of physically disabled men in South Korea. Fashion and Textiles, 12(1). Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40691-025-00425-y
Lavoye, V., & Kumar, H. (2025). Understanding how augmented reality’s immersive experience and privacy concerns impact consumer responses: A cognitive perspective. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 87. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2025.104425
Lee, Y.-J., Chen, H., & Zhao, W. (2025). Virtual responsibility: Understanding consumer engagement in corporate social responsibility virtual reality experiences across heavy and low product users. Journal of Digital and Social Media Marketing, 13(2), 170–182. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.69554/JTEV5155
Longhofer, J., Floersch, J., & Hoy, J. (2012). Qualitative Methods for Practice Research (p. 224). Oxford University Press; Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195398472.001.0001
Lutz, W., & Knox, S. (2014). Quantitative and qualitative methods in psychotherapy research (p. 448). Taylor and Francis; Scopus. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203386071
McNabb, D. E. (2015). Research methods for political science: Quantitative and qualitative methods: Second edition (p. 426). Taylor and Francis; Scopus. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315701141
Migdal, A. B. (2018). Qualitative Methods in Quantum Theory (p. 460). CRC Press; Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1201/9780429497940
Mrad, M., Ramadan, Z., Tóth, Z., Nasr, L., & Karimi, S. (2025). Virtual Influencers Versus Real Connections: Exploring the Phenomenon of Virtual Influencers. Journal of Advertising, 54(1), 1–19. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2024.2393711
Mukhlis, L. (2025a). A Phenomenological Study of Personal Spiritual Experiences in Navigating Religious Pluralism within Interfaith Communities. Irfana: Journal of Religious Studies, 1(6), 212–220.
Mukhlis, L. (2025b). Spiritual Grounds for Economic Growth: A Qualitative Exploration of Rural Indonesian Women’s Transformative Journeys Through Mosque-Led Empowerment Programs. Servina: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat, 1(8), 289–298.
Mukhlis, L., & Abdullah, M. N. (2025). Hukum Keluarga Islam di Indonesia (1st ed.). Mukhlisina Revolution Center.
Mukhlis, L., Arifin, T., Ridwan, A. H., & Zulbaidah. (2024). Integrating Artificial Intelligenceand Maqāṣid al-Syarī‘ah: Revolutionizing Indonesia’s Sharia Online Trading System. Computer Fraud and Security, 2024(11), 301–309. https://doi.org/10.52710/cfs.238
Mukhlis, L., Arifin, T., Ridwan, A. H., & Zulbaidah. (2025). Reorientation of Sharia Stock Regulations: Integrating Taṣarrufāt al-Rasūl and Maqāṣid al-Sharī‘ah for Justice and Sustainability. Journal of Information Systems Engineering and Management, 10(10s), 58–66. https://doi.org/10.52783/jisem.v10i10s.1341
Mukhlis, L., Arifin, T., Ridwan, A. H., Zulbaidah, Rosadi, A., & Solehudin, E. (2025). Reformulation of Islamic Stock Law: The Application of Taṣarrufāt al-Rasūl and Maqāṣid al-Syarī‘ahto Develop a Dynamic and Sustainable Islamic Capital Market in Indonesia. Journal of Posthumanism, 5(3), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.63332/joph.v5i3.913
Mukhlis, L., Janwari, Y., & Syafe`i, R. (2023). INDONESIA STOCK EXCHANGE: THEORETICAL AND PHILOSOPHICAL ANALYSIS OF MUDHARABAH AND MUSYARAKAH CONTRACTS. Yurisprudentia: Jurnal Hukum Ekonomi, 9(2), 243–264. https://doi.org/10.24952/yurisprudentia.v9i2.8466
Mukhlis, L., Maryam, S., & Sormin, S. A. (2023). Model Pembelajaran Living History Berbasis PjBL Untuk Meningkatkan Keterampilan Histografi Mahasiswa. Jurnal Educatio FKIP UNMA, 9(4), 1800–1809. https://doi.org/10.31949/educatio.v9i4.5595
Mukhlis, L., & Saidah, Y. (2025). Dynamics of Nature-Based learning in Developing Children’s Motoricic Skills: Teacher and Parent Perspectives. HUMANISMA: Journal of Gender Studies, 9(1), 64–79. http://dx.doi.org/10.30983/humanisme.v4i2.9366
Mukhlis, L., Suradi, Janwari, Y., & Syafe`i, R. (2023). Sosialisasi Saham Syariah sebagai Instrumen Pengembangan Ekonomi Masyarakat di Badan Kontak Majelis Taklim (BKMT) Kabupaten Mandailing Natal. Jurnal Pengabdian Multidisiplin, 3(2), 2–9. https://doi.org/10.51214/japamul.v3i2.604
Ni, S., Denizci Guillet, B., Gao, Y., Law, R., & Sun, B. (2025). Unveiling a Hidden Driver of Online Rating Bias: The Role of Consumer Variety-Seeking Behavior. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 20(3). Scopus. https://doi.org/10.3390/jtaer20030216
Pauwels, K., & Fagbola, L. (2025). Understanding retail media: Perspectives and implications for stakeholders. Journal of Retailing, 101(3), 315–330. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretai.2025.08.005
Pizzolato, K., Thacker, D., Toro-Pagán, N. M. D., Amin, N. S., Hanna, A., Turgeon, J., & Michaud, V. (2022). Utilizing Pharmacogenomics Results to Determine Opioid Appropriateness and Improve Pain Management in a Patient with Osteoarthritis. Pharmacogenomics and Personalized Medicine, 15, 943–950. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.2147/PGPM.S385272
Rakha, S., & Woudsma, C. (2025). Unraveling the interplay between individual characteristics and perceived accessibility. Journal of Transport and Health, 44. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2025.102118
Stringer, G., Ferguson, J., Walshe, K., Allen, T., Grigoroglou, C., Kontopantelis, E., & Ashcroft, D. M. (2025). What seems to be the problem? Locum doctors, liminality and concerns about performance. Social Science and Medicine, 383. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.118489
Sun, H., Xu, X., & Xu, X. (2025). When social media sharing backfires: How early sharing intention shapes divergent consumer choices. Marketing Letters, 36(3), 669–687. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-024-09750-6
Tsai, P.-H., Hsieh, M.-C., & Tang, J.-W. (2025). Utilising podcast digital content marketing to influence consumer purchasing behaviour on e-commerce platform: A study on social presence and media richness theories. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 73. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2025.101529
Ul-Haq, S. U., & Kwok, R. Y.-K. (2025). When hate does not last: The evolution of brand schema in online communities. Qualitative Market Research, 28(4), 625–651. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1108/QMR-06-2024-0105
Zhang, Y., Huang, J., & Pang, Q. (2025). Turning Setbacks into Smiles: Exploring the Role of Self-Mocking Strategies in Consumers’ Recovery Satisfaction After E-Commerce Service Failures. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 20(3). Scopus. https://doi.org/10.3390/jtaer20030183