Muslim Widows’ Lived Experiences in Navigating Inheritance Rights in Indonesian Religious Courts
Main Article Content
Abstract
Islamic inheritance law represents a vital intersection between religious doctrine, social norms, and gender dynamics in Muslim-majority societies. While doctrinal clarity exists, the lived experiences of women particularly widows navigating inheritance processes remain underexplored. Previous research has largely focused on legal procedures and theoretical principles, leaving unanswered how Muslim widows personally experience and interpret the pursuit of their inheritance rights within religious court systems. This study uses a descriptive phenomenological approach to explore how justice, agency, and identity are subjectively constructed through this legal journey. In-depth interviews were conducted with nine Muslim widows who had pursued inheritance claims in Indonesian religious courts, and data were analyzed thematically using Colaizzi’s method. The findings reveal four major themes: feelings of powerlessness in the legal system, social stigma and family pressure, strategies of resilience, and moral reinterpretation of justice through faith. These themes uncover the complex emotional and spiritual dimensions of legal experience that are often absent in normative analyses. The study deepens our understanding of justice as a lived experience and offers a foundation for culturally grounded legal advocacy. These insights hold potential for future research on gender-sensitive reform and experiential legal studies in other Islamic contexts. However, this study is limited by its small sample size, focus on a single national context, and reliance on self-reported narratives, which may not fully capture the diversity of widows’ experiences across different regions or legal settings. Acknowledging these limitations helps contextualize the findings and underscores the need for broader comparative research.
Article Details
Section

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Alfiander, D. (2022). Disparity in the Considerations of Judges in Deciding Divorce Disputes in Religious Courts and District Courts. Juris: Jurnal Ilmiah Syariah, 21(1), 109–119. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.31958/juris.v21i1.5716
Apriantoro, M. S., Ibnu Alis, M. N., Septianozakia, S., & Setiana, D. (2023). Comparing KHI and KHES in Marital Property Grant Disputes: An Analysis of Judges’ Views. Al-Istinbath: Jurnal Hukum Islam, 8(1), 37–52. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.29240/jhi.v8i1.6464
Asmuni, A., & Adikara, R. N. (2024). Application of Very Urgent Criteria in The Marriage Dispensation Norms for the Protection of Children: Analysis of Jasser Auda’s Theory. Jurnal Hukum Islam, 22(1), 25–56. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.28918/jhi_v22i1_2
Aziz, S. U. (2023). Annulment of Marriage Due to Husband’s Sexual Disorder (Study of Yogyakarta Religious Court Decision Number: 176/Pdt.G/2019/PA. Yk). El-Usrah, 6(1), 193–205. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.22373/ujhk.v6i1.17412
Bilalu, N., Jamal, R., Harun, N., & Subeitan, S. M. (2022). Compilation of Islamic Law as Judge’s Consideration at a Religious Court in North Sulawesi, Indonesia. Samarah, 6(2), 514–536. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.22373/sjhk.v6i2.12441
Faiz, A. K., Zulfahmi, A. R., & Izzuddin, A. (2022). Between State Law and Islamic Law: The Practice of Divorce Outside the Situbondo Religious Courts, Indonesia. Journal of Islamic Law, 3(2), 176–192. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.24260/jil.v3i2.848
Fausi, A. (2024). Determination of the Minimum Age Limit for Marriage: Balancing Legal Supremacy and the Objectives of Sharia in Indonesian Marriage Law. Mazahib Jurnal Pemikiran Hukum Islam, 23(1), 117–154. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.21093/mj.v23i1.7611
Fife, W. (2020). Counting as a Qualitative Method: Grappling with the Reliability Issue in Ethnographic Research (p. 140). Springer International Publishing; Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-34803-8
Firdawaty, L., Zuhraini, Z., & Fajar, M. S. (2024). Contextualization of Reciprocal Values in the Fulfillment of Finantial Support as an Effort to Strengthen Families. Al-Istinbath: Jurnal Hukum Islam, 9(2), 399–426. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.29240/jhi.v9i2.10215
Fitri, A., Bahar, M., Azwar, Z., & Ediz, M. H. (2024). Divorce Lawsuit Due to Impotence Perspective Maslahat Theory: Case study of the Andoolo Religious Court Decision, Southeast Sulawesi. El-Usrah, 7(1), 220–236. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.22373/ujhk.v7i1.21860
Gemilang, K. M., Firmanda, H., Lastfitriani, H., & Hakimi, A. R. (2023). Discussing the Phenomenon of the Appointment of Judges in District Courts Regarding Interfaith Marriages from a Legal Logic Perspective. Al-Istinbath: Jurnal Hukum Islam, 8(2), 307–324. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.29240/jhi.v8i2.8185
Hadi, M. N., Islamiyah, L., & Kurniawan, C. S. (2023). Conservatism on Islamic Legal Maxims: Judicial Interpretation of Polygamous Marriage at the Religious Courts of Mojokerto, Indonesia. Journal of Islamic Law, 4(2), 172–196. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.24260/jil.v4i2.1637
Hakim, M. L. (2024). Between Hibah and Waṣiat Wājibah for Non-Muslims: Expansive Legal Interpretations by Indonesian Religious Judges in Inheritance Cases. Al-Ahwal, 17(2), 147–166. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.14421/ahwal.2024.17201
Hanapi, A., Aini, S., & Sari, C. E. P. (2024). Bridging Fiqh and Positive Law: A New Paradigm for Child Legality and the Best Interest of the Child in Indonesia. Juris: Jurnal Ilmiah Syariah, 23(2), 293–308. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.31958/juris.v23i2.10712
Hasan, M. (2023). Construction of Modern Islamic Inheritance Law based on Ijtihad of the Judges at the Religious Court of Pontianak, West Kalimantan. Samarah, 7(2), 650–668. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.22373/sjhk.v7i2.8852
Hasibuan, R. A. (2022). CONSIDERATIONS OF JUDGES OF THE BINJAI RELIGIOUS COURT IN DETERMINING THE STATUS OF THE MISSING DEFENDANT IN DIVORCE CASES IN THE PERSPECTIVE OF PROGRESSIVE LEGAL THEORY. Jurnal Ilmiah Mizani, 9(1), 157–166. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.29300/mzn.v9i1.2892
Ilhami, H., Nugraheni, D. B., & Wijayanta, T. (2023). CHILD PROTECTION POST THE NEW MARRIAGE LAW: HOW INDONESIAN RELIGIOUS COURT INTERPRETING THE URGENCY IN CHILD-AGE MARRIAGE. Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum Dan Keadilan, 11(1), 75–95. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.29303/ius.v11i1.1054
Kasim, N. M., & Daud, I. S. (2022). Application of The Concept of Maslahah by Judges to Issuance of Marriage Dispensation Due to Pregnancy in Religious Courts. Jambura Law Review, 4(1), 122–138. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.33756/jlr.v4i1.10999
Kawamura, Y. (2020). DOING RESEARCH IN FASHION AND DRESS: An Introduction to Qualitative Methods, 2nd edition (p. 166). Bloomsbury Publishing Plc.; Scopus. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85188589040&partnerID=40&md5=b3db406659cd1ea5b20e05664bec39a3
Mera, N., Taufan, M., Sapruddin, B., & Cahyani, A. I. (2024). Child Custody Rights for Mothers of Different Religions: Maqāṣid al-Sharī’ah Perspective on Islamic Family Law in Indonesia. Samarah, 8(3), 1644–1668. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.22373/sjhk.v8i3.23809
Mulia, H. I., Wirya, A., Octavian, Y., Gunawan, R., Gooding, P., & Walvisch, J. (2024). Assessment of the Guardianship System for Persons with Psychosocial Disability in Indonesia. Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research, 26(1), 300–314. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.16993/sjdr.942
Murdan, M. (2025). A Judge’s Response to the Phenomenon of Indonesian Legal Pluralism: The Compartmentalization of Law on Divorce Case of Sasaknese Marriage. Justicia Islamica, 22(1), 49–70. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.21154/justicia.v22i1.9818
Mursyid, S., & Yusuf, N. (2022). Changes in Marriage Age Limits and Marriage Dispensations: A Study of Causes and Impacts on the Religious Courts in North Sulawesi. Samarah, 6(2), 975–996. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.22373/sjhk.v6i2.12439
Musawwamah, S. (2022). Divorcing Husbands as a Solution to Protect Women’s Dignity: A Case Study of Domestic Violence at Madura Religious Court. Samarah, 6(2), 997–1021. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.22373/sjhk.v6i2.14929
Mustofa, K. N. (2023). ADJUDICATING UNDERAGE MARRIAGES AT RELIGIOUS COURTS A Progressive Collaboration between Judiciary and Health Authority. Al-Ahwal, 16(2), 342–363. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.14421/ahwal.2023.16208
Nabilah, W., Putra, R., Afroo, F. A., Nurjanah, N., & Wahyuni, E. (2025). Between Protection and Permissiveness: A Fiqh Siyasah Reexamination of Marriage Dispensation in Indonesia. Juris: Jurnal Ilmiah Syariah, 24(1), 137–151. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.31958/juris.v24i1.11882
Nasution, A. A., Tanjung, D., & Siregar, R. S. (2024). Effectiveness of Badan Penasihat Pembinaan dan Pelestarian Perkawinan in the Prospective Bride Course Program as an Effort to Anticipate Divorce. Jurnal Ilmiah Mizani, 11(1), 194–205. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.29300/mzn.v11i1.4759
Ngadi, R. (2024). Disharmonization of the Authority of Judicial Institutions Regarding the Implementation of Executions on Mortgage Objects of Sharia Economic. Jambura Law Review, 6(1), 126–149. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.33756/jlr.v6i1.20692
Perry, N. E. (2023). Using qualitative methods to enrich understandings of self-regulated learning: A special issue of educational psychologist (p. 64). Taylor and Francis Inc.; Scopus. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410608529
Rifqi, M. J., Nadhifah, N. A., Hadi, M. N., Junaidy, A. B., & Solikin, A. (2025). Children’s Legal Identity at Stake: Reconstructing Maqāṣid al-Syarī‘ah through Marriage Isbat Applications by the Second Generation in Pasuruan. El-Mashlahah, 15(1), 125–148. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.23971/el-mashlahah.v15i1.9068
Rofii, A. (2023). Constitutional Limits of Islamic Law: God in the Preamble to the Indonesian Constitution. Journal of Law, Religion and State, 11(1–3), 1–34. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1163/22124810-11010001
Saepullah, U., & Hopipah, E. N. (2023). Domestic Violence in the Perspective of Civil and Islamic Criminal Law. Al-’Adalah, 20(2), 427–452. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.24042/adalah.v20i2.19438
Sebyar, M. H., Jafar, W. A., Harahap, S. M., Putra, D., & Efendi, R. (2025). Divorce Mediation at Panyabungan Religious Court: Transforming the Desire for Divorce into Reconciliation through Cultural Values in Contemporary Islamic Jurisprudence. Al-Manahij: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Islam, 19(1), 81–100. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.24090/mnh.v19i1.12255
Setyawan, R., Witro, D., Busni, D., Kustiawan, M. T., & Syahbani, F. Z. M. (2024). Contemporary Ijtihad Deconstruction in The Supreme Court: Wasiat Wajibah as An Alternative for Non-Muslim Heirs in Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmiah Al-Syir’ah, 22(1), 25–40. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.30984/jis.v22i1.2968
Sidqi, I., Nisa, S. M., & Daini, H. S. (2023). Development of Artificial Intelligence in the Dispute Resolution of Religious Courts. Jurnal Hukum Islam, 21(1), 83–112. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.28918/jhi_v21i1_04
Sudirman, L., & Fasieh, M. A. (2023). Dwangsom: Investigate the Conceptual Basis of Religious Court on Child Custody Rulings. Jurnal Ilmiah Al-Syir’ah, 21(2), 173–185. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.30984/jis.v21i2.2500
Sururie, R. W., Hopipah, E. N., Witro, D., Diana, R., & Sopiyan, M. (2024). CO-PARENTING MODEL IN RESOLVING CHILD CUSTODY DISPUTES IN URBAN MUSLIM FAMILIES. Petita: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum Dan Syariah, 9(1), 250–268. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.22373/petita.v9i1.277
Talli, A. H., Akram, A., Sinelele, A., Dahlan, D., & Hakim, L. (2023). Application of the Principle of Truth to Judiciary Institutions: Discourse of Judges at the Makassar Religious High Court, Indonesia. Samarah, 7(1), 302–320. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.22373/sjhk.v7i1.14865
Zainuddin, M., & Filzah, N. (2022). Divorce Problems and Community Social Capital in Realizing Family Resilience in Aceh. Samarah, 6(2), 914–933. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.22373/sjhk.v6i2.15080
Zuhriah, E., Mayasari, L. D., Rahmawati, E. S., Abdul Razak, A. Q. B., & Sukadi, I. (2023). Dispen-ku Android-Based Application: Assisting Religious Court Judges in Deciding for Marriage Dispensation. Al-Ihkam: Jurnal Hukum Dan Pranata Sosial, 18(2), 519–543. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.19105/al-lhkam.v18i2.8773