Sovereignty in Global Governance: Developing Nations' Roles and Subjective Experiences in International Forums

Abstract

Global governance has increasingly highlighted the tension between state sovereignty and the demands of international cooperation, particularly in forums addressing transnational challenges. While prior research has examined structural inequalities in these settings, little attention has been paid to the subjective experiences of representatives from developing nations navigating these dynamics. This study addresses the gap by exploring how these individuals perceive and respond to systemic inequities in global governance processes. Using an interpretive phenomenological approach, the research investigates the lived experiences of diplomats, academics, and representatives actively participating in international forums. Key findings reveal themes of exclusion from informal decision-making processes, perceptions of power imbalances, and the strategic reliance on regional alliances to amplify marginalized voices. These insights were derived through in-depth interviews and thematic analysis, providing a nuanced understanding of how developing nations engage with systemic barriers while asserting their sovereignty. The results contribute to a more holistic understanding of global governance, offering specific and actionable recommendations to enhance inclusivity and equity. These include establishing structured consultation mechanisms that ensure meaningful participation from developing nations in agenda-setting processes, creating capacity-building programs to strengthen diplomatic negotiation skills, and institutionalizing transparent decision-making procedures to mitigate informal exclusionary practices. Additionally, fostering long-term coalitions among developing countries and advocating for procedural reforms in international organizations are emphasized as key strategies for promoting equitable representation..