The Experience of Stakeholders in the Implementation of Sustainability Policies in Industrial Areas

Main Article Content

Dewi Gunawati Dewi Gunawati

Abstract

The discourse on the difference in stakeholder understanding of the implementation of environmental sustainability policies in industrial estates is interesting to study. Environmental sustainability policies are crucial for achieving long-term ecological balance, especially in industrial zones where economic growth often conflicts with environmental preservation. Despite existing regulations, the implementation of these policies remains inconsistent, with little focus on the subjective experiences of stakeholders involved. A gap exists in understanding how stakeholders perceive and experience the implementation of sustainability policies in industrial contexts, particularly in terms of their challenges and opportunities. This study employs a phenomenological approach to explore the lived experiences of key stakeholders in industrial zones, aiming to address this gap. Through in-depth interviews and thematic analysis, we found that stakeholders—managers, community representatives, and government officials—face significant barriers, including economic pressures, lack of coordination, and conflicting priorities between profitability and sustainability.  the findings of stakeholders on environmental sustainability in industrial zones experience significant obstacles to economic pressure, lack of coordination, and priorities

Article Details

Section

Articles

References

Ahmed, S. O. F., & Gopi, A. (2024). A Hybrid MCDM Model for Service Composition in Cloud Manufacturing using O-TOPSIS. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 15(4), 347–352. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.14569/IJACSA.2024.0150436

Arif, A., Zakeri, Z., Omurtag, A., Breedon, P., & Khalid, A. (2024). Neurophysiological Approach for Psychological Safety: Enhancing Mental Health in Human–Robot Collaboration in Smart Manufacturing Setups Using Neuroimaging. Information (Switzerland), 15(10). Scopus. https://doi.org/10.3390/info15100640

Deniša, M., & Ude, A. (2024). Improving Ergonomics of Collaborative Robot Workcells Using Passive Reconfigurable Fixtures. IEEE Access, 12, 124871–124888. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3451975

Frick, N., Terwolbeck, J., Seibel, B., & Metternich, J. (2024). Design Model for the Digital Shadow of a Value Stream. Systems, 12(1). Scopus. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems12010020

Friebel, A. G., Potter, R. E., & Dollard, M. (2024). Health and safety representatives’ perceptions of occupational health and safety policy developments to improve work-related psychological heath: Applying the theory of planned behaviour. Safety Science, 172. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2023.106410

Lan, R., Awolusi, I., & Cai, J. (2024). Computer Vision for Safety Management in the Steel Industry. AI (Switzerland), 5(3), 1192–1215. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.3390/ai5030058

Li, Y., Su, D. A., & Mardani, A. (2023). Digital twins and blockchain technology in the industrial Internet of Things (IIoT) using an extended decision support system model: Industry 4.0 barriers perspective. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 195. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122794

Li, Y.-Y., & Gan, J. (2023). Effect of wearable chair on gait, balance, and discomfort of new users during level walking with anterior loads. Journal of Safety Research, 87, 27–37. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2023.08.013

Lone, M. A., Kovács, S., & Khanday, O. M. (2024). Implementation Guidelines for Ethologically Inspired Fuzzy Behaviour-Based Systems. Infocommunications Journal, 16(3), 43–56. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.36244/ICJ.2024.3.4

Mitterlehner, L., Li, Y. X., & Wolf, M. (2023). Objective and subjective evaluation of a passive low-back exoskeleton during simulated logistics tasks. Wearable Technologies, 4. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1017/wtc.2023.19

Nila, B., & Roy, J. (2024). Analysing the Key Success Factors of Logistics Center 4.0 Implementation Using Improved Pythagorean Fuzzy DEMATEL Method. Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, 49(9), 11883–11905. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-023-08398-0

Rao, M. C. A., Raj, S., Shah, A. K., Harshitha, B. R., Talawar, N. R., Sharma, V. K., Sanjana, M., Vishwakarma, H., & Biswas, P. (2024). Development and comparison studies of XR interfaces for path definition in remote welding scenarios. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 83(18), 55365–55404. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-023-17604-y

Rustandi, Y., & Farid, A. (2023). Involvement of Millennial Farmers in the Implementation of Integrated Agriculture in Trenggalek District, East Java, Indonesia. Anuario do Instituto de Geociencias, 47. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.11137/1982-3908_2024_47_60967

Tang, W., Zhang, H., Chen, H., Fan, W., & Wang, Q. (2024). A Non-Destructive Detection and Grading Method of the Internal Quality of Preserved Eggs Based on an Improved ConvNext. Foods, 13(6). Scopus. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods13060925

Vysocký, A., Poštulka, T., Chlebek, J., Kot, T., Maslowski, J., & Grushko, S. (2023). Hand Gesture Interface for Robot Path Definition in Collaborative Applications: Implementation and Comparative Study. Sensors, 23(9). Scopus. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23094219

Zhang, B., & Fu, S. (2023). Can Farmers’ Satisfaction with Green Production Policies Be Explained by Policy Structure and Policy Implementation? Evidence from China. Sustainability (Switzerland), 15(12). Scopus. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15129469