Exploring the Experiences and Perceptions of Policymakers on Digital Transformation in Public Governance Indonesia

Main Article Content

Eko Ujiyanto

Abstract

Digital transformation in public policy has gained significant attention due to its potential to enhance governance, transparency, and efficiency. However, the subjective experiences of policymakers navigating these changes, particularly in relation to constitutional principles and human rights, remain largely underexplored. The knowledge gap in this area lies in understanding how digitalization impacts the decision-making processes and experiences of those involved in policy creation and implementation. In this study, we employ a phenomenological approach to investigate the lived experiences of policymakers in the executive and legislative branches concerning digital reforms and their implications for human rights and constitutional law. Through in-depth interviews with key participants, we identify that digital tools both improve efficiency and transparency but also introduce significant challenges in balancing technological advancements with legal protections. The findings highlight the dual nature of digital transformation, emphasizing the need for a careful and balanced approach to policy reforms. These results offer critical insights that can inform future policy decisions by guiding the ethical integration of digital tools in governance, as well as suggesting avenues for future research focused on the evolving relationship between technology, governance, and human rights.

Article Details

Section

Articles

References

Chen, H., Wang, E., Song, T., Wang, Y., & Ye, Z. (2024). Four-quadrant modelling of carbon inequality in international trade and accounting for carbon compensation. Carbon Management, 15(1). Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1080/17583004.2024.2311655

De Castro, D. (2019). The resurgence of old forms in the exploitation of natural resources: The colonial ontology of the prior consultation principle. Veredas do Direito, 16(34), 343–365. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.18623/rvd.v16i34.1387

Dzimiri, P. (2014). The responsibility to protect and the youth: A case study of the youth activism in Zimbabwe. Anthropologist, 17(2), 441–454. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1080/09720073.2014.11891453

Erkişi, K., & Boǧa, S. (2023). Does Financial Inclusion Improve Income Equality? The Case of Türkiye. ECONOMICS - Innovative and Economics Research Journal, 11(2), 79–95. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.2478/eoik-2023-0049

Hossain, S. Sh., & Delin, H. (2021). Comparison and analysis of tariff reduction of infrastructural sectors and its economic impact: ACGE approach. International Journal of Human Capital in Urban Management, 6(3), 253–262. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.22034/IJHCUM.2021.03.04

Jacinto, M. (2023). Assessing the Stability of the Core/Periphery Structure and Mobility in the Post-2008 Global Crisis Era: A World-Systems Analysis of the International Trade Network. Journal of World-Systems Research, 29(2), 401–430. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.5195/JWSR.2023.1148

Kalafsky, R. V., & Graves, W. W. (2020). Global reach and second-tier cities: An initial exploration of export activity from the bottom of the U.S. metropolitan hierarchy. Journal of Urban Affairs, 42(7), 1014–1027. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1080/07352166.2019.1619461

Liu, Y., Li, H., An, H., Guan, J., Shi, J., & Han, X. (2021). Are the environmental impacts, resource flows and economic benefits proportional? Analysis of key global trade routes based on the steel life cycle. Ecological Indicators, 122. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.107306

Prasai, K. (2024). The Belt and Road Initiative in Nepal: Potential impacts and implications. Human Geography(United Kingdom), 17(2), 178–189. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1177/19427786231198188

Rollo, J., & Winters, L. A. (2000). Subsidiarity and governance challenges for the WTO: Environmental and labour standards. World Economy, 23(4), 561–576. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9701.00290

Sone, E., & Ko, J.-H. (2024). COVID-19 Pandemic and its Economic Impact on the Global Economy: A Computable General Equilibrium Approach. Coronaviruses, 5(2), 72–86. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.2174/0126667975269693231107072320

Standardi, G. (2023). Exploring market-driven adaptation to climate change in a general equilibrium global trade model. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 28(2). Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-023-10049-6

Sylvester, M. M. (2024). Globalisation of Economies: The Role of Regional Integration in Repositioning African Economies within the Global Order. African Journal of Business and Economic Research, 19(4), 9–27. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.31920/1750-4562/2024/v19n4a1

Vishnevsky, V. P., Goncharenko, L. I., Nikulkina, I. V., & Gurnak, A. V. (2020). Taxes and Technologies: Past, Present and Future of the Russian Tax System. Terra Economicus, 18(4), 6–31. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.18522/2073-6606-2020-18-4-6-31

Wang, S., Wang, J., Chen, X., Fang, C., Hubacek, K., Liu, X., Zhou, C., Feng, K., & Liu, Z. (2023). Impact of International Trade on the Carbon Intensity of Human Well-Being. Environmental Science and Technology, 57(17), 6898–6909. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.2c07582