The Experience of Human Rights Advocacy by Civil Society Organizations in Developing Countries: Activists' Perspectives on Facing Social and Legal Obstacles
Main Article Content
Abstract
Human rights advocacy is a critical field that seeks to understand and address the experiences of individuals whose rights are violated, especially within marginalized communities. While existing research has explored the broader impacts of human rights violations, there is a lack of in-depth understanding of the lived experiences of these individuals, particularly in terms of their personal perceptions and meaning-making processes. This study aims to fill this gap by exploring the subjective experiences of individuals who have been impacted by human rights violations, asking: What are the essential meanings and lived experiences of individuals within this context?
Here, we show how a phenomenological approach can be employed to provide a deeper understanding of the emotional and cognitive processes involved in human rights violations. Using in-depth semi-structured interviews with individuals who have experienced human rights abuses, we conducted a thematic analysis to uncover core themes and meanings. Our findings highlight the profound psychological, social, and emotional effects of human rights violations, emphasizing the participants' struggles with identity, trauma, and resilience in the face of adversity.
These results contribute to a more nuanced understanding of human rights violations, offering important insights into the impact on individuals and their coping mechanisms. Our study suggests that phenomenological methods can provide critical perspectives on human rights that quantitative approaches are unable to capture, and it calls for further research into the personal narratives of affected individuals to inform more compassionate and effective human rights advocacy.
Article Details
Section
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Abdel-Fattah, A., Hamdan, S., Ayadi, O., & Al-Khuraissat, M. (2022). Energy efficiency and thermal insulation code violations for residential buildings in Jordan and the role of social advocacy campaigns. Energy for Sustainable Development, 71, 419–432. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esd.2022.10.013
Arafat, R. (2021). Examining Diaspora Journalists’ Digital Networks and Role Perceptions: A Case Study of Syrian Post-Conflict Advocacy Journalism. Journalism Studies, 22(16), 2174–2196. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2021.1990110
Bahçecik, Ş. O. (2019). Civil Society Responds to the AWS: Growing Activist Networks and Shifting Frames. Global Policy, 10(3), 365–369. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.12671
Boşnak, B. (2021). Politics of Subsidiarity in Refugee Reception: The Case of Civil Society in Turkey. Journal of Immigrant and Refugee Studies, 19(3), 301–315. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1080/15562948.2021.1951417
Cath, C. (2021). The technology we choose to create: Human rights advocacy in the Internet Engineering Task Force. Telecommunications Policy, 45(6). Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2021.102144
Ciupa, K., & Zalik, A. (2020). Enhancing corporate standing, shifting blame: An examination of Canada’s Extractive Sector Transparency Measures Act. Extractive Industries and Society, 7(3), 826–834. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exis.2020.07.018
de Oliveira, J. T. C., de Camargo, A. M., Machado, B. O. B., de Oliveira, A. R., Fiates, G. M. R., & de Assis Guedes de Vasconcelos, F. (2021). ”Hunger and rage (and the virus) are human things”: Reflections on solidarity in times of Covid-19. Revista de Nutricao, 34, 1–9. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-9865202134E200183
Gottardo, C., & Cyment, P. (2019). The Global Compact for Migration: What could it mean for women and gender relations? Gender and Development, 27(1), 67–83. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1080/13552074.2019.1570725
Hennebry, J. L., & Petrozziello, A. J. (2019). Closing the Gap? Gender and the Global Compacts for Migration and Refugees. International Migration, 57(6), 115–138. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1111/imig.12640
Lu, Y. (2021). Negotiating the Right to Information: Citizen–Government Interactions in the Implementation of the Regulations on Open Government Information in China. Europe - Asia Studies, 73(1), 81–100. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1080/09668136.2020.1841740
Njoku, E. T. (2021). State-oriented service-delivery partnership with civil society organizations in the context of counter-terrorism in Nigeria. Development Policy Review, 39(5), 757–772. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1111/dpr.12524
Porlezza, C., & Arafat, R. (2022). Promoting Newsafety from the Exile: The Emergence of New Journalistic Roles in Diaspora Journalists’ Networks. Journalism Practice, 16(9), 1867–1889. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2021.1925947
Tamang, J., Khanal, A., Tamang, A., Gaspard, N., Magee, M., Schaaf, M., McGovern, T., & Maistrellis, E. (2020). Foreign ideology vs. National priority: Impacts of the US Global Gag Rule on Nepal’s sexual and reproductive healthcare system. Sexual and Reproductive Health Matters, 28(3). Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1080/26410397.2020.1831717
Tastsoglou, E., & Nourpanah, S. (2019). (Re)Producing Gender: Refugee Advocacy and Sexual and Gender-Based Violence in Refugee Narratives. Canadian Ethnic Studies, 51(3), 37–56. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1353/ces.2019.0019
Ushie, B. A., Juma, K., Kimemia, G., Magee, M., Maistrellis, E., McGovern, T., & Casey, S. E. (2020). Foreign assistance or attack? Impact of the expanded Global Gag Rule on sexual and reproductive health and rights in Kenya. Sexual and Reproductive Health Matters, 28(3). Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1080/26410397.2020.1794412
Vernaelde, J. M. (2022). The U.S. Global Gag Rule in Ethiopia: A foreign policy challenging domestic sexual and reproductive health and rights gains. Reproductive Health, 19. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-022-01329-6