Exploring the Lived Experience of Social Reintegration Among Paroled Ex-Convicts in the Indonesian Context

Main Article Content

Nursaima Harahap

Abstract

This study investigates social reintegration after incarceration, a critical area in criminal justice research—particularly in cultural contexts like Southeast Asia where stigma and systemic barriers complicate the post-prison experience. While prior research has examined reintegration from institutional and policy perspectives, fewer studies have explored the lived experiences of ex-convicts. The main objective of this study is to understand how individuals on parole interpret and navigate their reintegration journey within a society that often marginalizes them. Specifically, the study asks: How do ex-convicts make sense of their post-incarceration lives in Indonesia? Methodologically, this study employs an interpretative phenomenological approach (IPA), using in-depth, semi-structured interviews with eight parolees. Data were analyzed through Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis to uncover the subjective meanings participants assign to their reintegration process. The findings indicate that reintegration is experienced as a process of reconstructing identity, enduring stigma, and negotiating conditional acceptance. Key themes include persistent social exclusion, emotional dislocation, and institutional neglect, all of which deeply influence how participants experience reintegration. These results suggest that reintegration is not merely a legal or procedural transition but an existential and relational struggle. The study highlights the necessity of empathy-based support systems and calls for culturally responsive reintegration policies. By offering participant-centered insights grounded in the Indonesian context, this research contributes to the expanding discourse on post-incarceration experiences and underscores the value of phenomenological methods in criminal justice studies.

Article Details

Section

Articles

References

Ahmad, M. I., & Santoso, T. (2020). The effect of the pre-release training program on the rate of recidivism of prisoners in Indonesia. Indonesia Journal of Corrections, 14(3), 210–225.

Andini, R., & Fauzan, M. (2023). Evaluation of the parole program at Bapas Class IIA Bandar Lampung: Case studies and recommendations. Journal of Law and Correctional Studies, 11(2), 120–136.

Bara, F., Tallo, D. D., & Amalo, H. (2021). Application of transtheoretical theory and reintegrative shaming theory to the rehabilitation of ex-convicts. Journal of Criminology and Corrections, 15(1), 88–103.

Cabael, A. L. F., Peralta, P. D., & Aggari, A. N. B. (2024). Aftermath of incarceration: A phenomenological investigation of ex-inmates’ reintegration to the society. Southeast Journal of Arts and Sciences, 1(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15269239

Fajar, U., & Murakami, T. (2024). Analysis of Robert K. Merton’s adaptation typology in the implementation of social reintegration program of correctional client: Case study at Sintang Correctional Center, Indonesia. Restorative: Journal of Indonesian Probation and Parole System, 2(2), 103–113. https://doi.org/10.61682/restorative.v2i2.16

Halili, S. H. (2019). Technological advancements in education 4.0. The Online Journal of Distance Education and e-Learning, 7(1), 63–69.

Higley, C. A., Lloyd, C. D., & Serin, R. C. (2019). Age and motivation can be specific responsivity features that moderate the relationship between risk and rehabilitation outcome. Law and Human Behavior, 43(6), 558–567. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000348

Jarldorn, M. (2020). Radically rethinking social work in the criminal (in)justice system in Australia. Affilia - Journal of Women and Social Work, 35(3), 327–343. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886109919866160

Kote, A. (2025). The lived experience of prisoners in the Indonesian criminal justice system: Investigating the rehabilitation process and legal reforms in prisons. Hukmuna: Journal of Law and Policy, 1(2025), 1–15.

Mdakane, M., Nkambule, B., & Ngubane, S. (2024). A phenomenological investigation into the role of a university degree in the reintegration of ex-offenders into the labour market. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 1(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4872749

Monica, D. R., Dewi, E., Fardiansyah, A. I., & Fathonah, R. (2024). Social reintegration of inmates through right to parole. International Journal of Religion, 5(11), 7762–7768. https://doi.org/10.61707/cjvwnw03

Rasmiaty, M. (2025). Civil identity restoration in the social reintegration of former convicts. Hukmuna: Journal of Law and Policy, 5(2025), 1–15.

Sari, D. P., & Nugroho, B. (2021). Obstacles to social reintegration of prisoners through the conditional development program in Indonesia: An empirical study. Journal of Criminology and Corrections, 15(1), 88–103.

Sari, N. P. D. M., & Muhammad, A. (2022). Synergy between community supervisors and correctional care community groups (Pokmas Lipas) in supporting the actualization of social reintegration programs for correctional clients in Class I Bapas. Journal of Criminology and Corrections, 16(2), 150–165.

Wodahl, E. J. (2006). The challenges of prisoner reentry: Understanding the dynamics of recidivism. Journal of Qualitative Criminal Justice & Criminology, 4(2), 204–228.