Tourists' Experiences in Interpreting Sustainable Tourism: A Study on Ecotourism Destinations in Indonesia

Main Article Content

Anas Pattaray

Abstract

Sustainable tourism has emerged as a critical paradigm in the global tourism industry, emphasizing environmental preservation, social equity, and cultural authenticity. In the context of ecotourism, tourists' experiences are deeply emotional and transformative, influencing their perceptions of sustainability and ethical responsibility. However, existing research predominantly uses quantitative approaches that fail to capture the subjective meanings and emotional dimensions of these experiences. This study investigates how tourists construct meanings and interpret their experiences of sustainable tourism using an interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA) approach. Data were collected through in-depth semi-structured interviews with 18 tourists visiting ecotourism destinations in Indonesia and analyzed using thematic analysis to identify experiential themes. The findings reveal that tourists’ perceptions of sustainability are shaped by emotional connections with nature, ethical responsibility toward local communities, and a desire for authentic cultural immersion, highlighting the emotional, social, and ethical dimensions of sustainable tourism. These insights provide a holistic understanding of tourists' subjective experiences, contributing to the literature by offering a phenomenological perspective on sustainable tourism. The study underscores the importance of experiential authenticity and emotional engagement in influencing tourists' sustainable behaviors and provides strategic implications for experience design and destination marketing. These findings pave the way for future research on cross-cultural comparisons, longitudinal impacts, and the role of digital narratives in shaping sustainability meanings.

Article Details

Section

Articles

References

Adu, D. A., Al-Najjar, B., & Sitthipongpanich, T. (2022). Executive compensation, environmental performance, and sustainable banking: The moderating effect of governance mechanisms. Business Strategy and the Environment, 31(4), 1439–1463. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2963

Alkaraan, F., Elmarzouky, M., Hussainey, K., Venkatesh, V. G., Shi, Y., & Gulko, N. (2024). Reinforcing green business strategies with Industry 4.0 and governance towards sustainability: Natural-resource-based view and dynamic capability. Business Strategy and the Environment, 33(4), 3588–3606. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3665

Bhatti, A., Rehman, S. U., & Rumman, J. B. A. (2020). Organizational capabilities mediates between organizational culture, entrepreneurial orientation, and organizational performance of smes in pakistan. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, 8(4), 85–103. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.15678/EBER.2020.080405

Chevrollier, N., Zhang, J., van Leeuwen, T., & Nijhof, A. (2020). The predictive value of strategic orientation for ESG performance over time. Corporate Governance (Bingley), 20(1), 123–142. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-03-2019-0105

De Masi, S., Słomka-Gołębiowska, A., Becagli, C., & Paci, A. (2021). Toward sustainable corporate behavior: The effect of the critical mass of female directors on environmental, social, and governance disclosure. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(4), 1865–1878. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2721

Galletta, S., Mazzù, S., & Naciti, V. (2021). Banks’ business strategy and environmental effectiveness: The monitoring role of the board of directors and the managerial incentives. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(5), 2656–2670. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2769

Hu, K.-H., Hsu, M.-F., Chen, F.-H., & Liu, M.-Z. (2021). Identifying the key factors of subsidiary supervision and management using an innovative hybrid architecture in a big data environment. Financial Innovation, 7(1). Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40854-020-00219-9

Martinez-Sanchez, A., Vicente-Oliva, S., & Pérez-Pérez, M. (2020). The strategy of human resource flexibility versus absorptive capacity of knowledge: An integrative framework in industrial firms. European Journal of Innovation Management, 24(2), 315–337. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-10-2019-0314

Mas-Tur, A., Kraus, S., Brandtner, M., Ewert, R., & Kürsten, W. (2020). Advances in management research: A bibliometric overview of the Review of Managerial Science. Review of Managerial Science, 14(5), 933–958. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-020-00406-z

Mattera, M., & Soto, F. (2023). Dodging the bullet: Overcoming the financial impact of Ukraine armed conflict with sustainable business strategies and environmental approaches. Journal of Risk Finance, 24(1), 122–142. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1108/JRF-04-2022-0092

Mattera, M., Soto Gonzalez, F., Alba Ruiz-Morales, C., & Gava, L. (2020). Facing a global crisis—How sustainable business models helped firms overcome COVID. Corporate Governance (Bingley), 21(6), 1100–1116. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-07-2020-0309

Nguyen, T., & Zhao, J. (2021). Industry tournament incentives and corporate innovation. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 48(9–10), 1797–1845. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1111/jbfa.12549

Oyewo, B., Tawiah, V., & Hussain, S. T. (2023). Drivers of environmental and social sustainability accounting practices in Nigeria: A corporate governance perspective. Corporate Governance (Bingley), 23(2), 397–421. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-09-2021-0336

Pasko, O., Chen, F., Kuts, T., Sharko, I., & Ryzhikova, N. (2022). Sustainability reporting nexus to corporate governance in scholarly literature. Environmental Economics, 13(1), 61–78. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.21511/ee.13(1).2022.06

Sewpersadh, N. S. (2019). An examination of CEO power with board vigilance as a catalyst for firm growth in South Africa. Measuring Business Excellence, 23(4), 377–395. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1108/MBE-10-2018-0083

Tan, J., Chan, K. C., & Chen, Y. (2022). The impact of air pollution on the cost of debt financing: Evidence from the bond market. Business Strategy and the Environment, 31(1), 464–482. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2904

Tanthanongsakkun, S., Treepongkaruna, S., & Jiraporn, P. (2023). Carbon emissions, corporate governance, and staggered boards. Business Strategy and the Environment, 32(1), 769–780. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3174

Virakul, B., & Russ-Eft, D. F. (2020). A model for business responses to global challenges and sustainable development. Social Responsibility Journal, 16(2), 199–224. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-09-2018-0223