Exploring Consumer Loyalty through Emotional Responses to Marketing Innovations

Main Article Content

Uslan

Abstract

Consumer behavior research, particularly in response to marketing innovations, has become increasingly important in understanding how consumers interact with new products and services. Despite significant studies on external product attributes, little attention has been paid to the subjective experiences and emotional responses consumers have to innovations. This gap in knowledge raises the question of how perceived value and emotional responses shape consumer loyalty to innovative products. This study uses a phenomenological approach to uncover the deep, lived experiences of consumers, shedding light on how these factors influence their loyalty. Through in-depth interviews with 15 participants, thematic analysis revealed that perceived value, emotional attachment, and perceived risk significantly impacted consumer loyalty toward innovative products. Consumers’ emotional connections to innovation were influenced by their perceptions of value and previous brand experiences, while risk perception acted as a moderating factor. Our findings provide valuable insights into the emotional and cognitive dimensions of consumer loyalty, offering a more comprehensive understanding of how consumers engage with innovations. These results contribute to the field by highlighting the importance of subjective experiences and suggest potential directions for future research on consumer behavior and innovation.

Article Details

Section

Articles

References

Adu, D. A., Al-Najjar, B., & Sitthipongpanich, T. (2022). Executive compensation, environmental performance, and sustainable banking: The moderating effect of governance mechanisms. Business Strategy and the Environment, 31(4), 1439–1463. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2963

Alkaraan, F., Elmarzouky, M., Hussainey, K., Venkatesh, V. G., Shi, Y., & Gulko, N. (2024). Reinforcing green business strategies with Industry 4.0 and governance towards sustainability: Natural-resource-based view and dynamic capability. Business Strategy and the Environment, 33(4), 3588–3606. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3665

Bhatti, A., Rehman, S. U., & Rumman, J. B. A. (2020). Organizational capabilities mediates between organizational culture, entrepreneurial orientation, and organizational performance of smes in pakistan. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, 8(4), 85–103. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.15678/EBER.2020.080405

Chevrollier, N., Zhang, J., van Leeuwen, T., & Nijhof, A. (2020). The predictive value of strategic orientation for ESG performance over time. Corporate Governance (Bingley), 20(1), 123–142. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-03-2019-0105

De Masi, S., Słomka-Gołębiowska, A., Becagli, C., & Paci, A. (2021). Toward sustainable corporate behavior: The effect of the critical mass of female directors on environmental, social, and governance disclosure. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(4), 1865–1878. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2721

Galletta, S., Mazzù, S., & Naciti, V. (2021). Banks’ business strategy and environmental effectiveness: The monitoring role of the board of directors and the managerial incentives. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(5), 2656–2670. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2769

Hu, K.-H., Hsu, M.-F., Chen, F.-H., & Liu, M.-Z. (2021). Identifying the key factors of subsidiary supervision and management using an innovative hybrid architecture in a big data environment. Financial Innovation, 7(1). Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40854-020-00219-9

Kumar, S., Sureka, R., Lim, W. M., Kumar Mangla, S., & Goyal, N. (2021). What do we know about business strategy and environmental research? Insights from Business Strategy and the Environment. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(8), 3454–3469. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2813

Lassoued, N., & Khanchel, I. (2023). Voluntary CSR disclosure and CEO narcissism: The moderating role of CEO duality and board gender diversity. Review of Managerial Science, 17(3), 1075–1123. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-022-00555-3

Martinez-Sanchez, A., Vicente-Oliva, S., & Pérez-Pérez, M. (2020). The strategy of human resource flexibility versus absorptive capacity of knowledge: An integrative framework in industrial firms. European Journal of Innovation Management, 24(2), 315–337. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-10-2019-0314

Mas-Tur, A., Kraus, S., Brandtner, M., Ewert, R., & Kürsten, W. (2020). Advances in management research: A bibliometric overview of the Review of Managerial Science. Review of Managerial Science, 14(5), 933–958. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-020-00406-z

Mattera, M., & Soto, F. (2023). Dodging the bullet: Overcoming the financial impact of Ukraine armed conflict with sustainable business strategies and environmental approaches. Journal of Risk Finance, 24(1), 122–142. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1108/JRF-04-2022-0092

Mattera, M., Soto Gonzalez, F., Alba Ruiz-Morales, C., & Gava, L. (2020). Facing a global crisis—How sustainable business models helped firms overcome COVID. Corporate Governance (Bingley), 21(6), 1100–1116. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-07-2020-0309

Nguyen, T., & Zhao, J. (2021). Industry tournament incentives and corporate innovation. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 48(9–10), 1797–1845. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1111/jbfa.12549

Oyewo, B., Tawiah, V., & Hussain, S. T. (2023). Drivers of environmental and social sustainability accounting practices in Nigeria: A corporate governance perspective. Corporate Governance (Bingley), 23(2), 397–421. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-09-2021-0336