A Critical Review of Theoretical Frameworks and Methodological Challenges in Digital Taxation: Bridging the Gap Between Theory and Practice
Main Article Content
Abstract
The digital taxation landscape has evolved rapidly, yet inconsistencies in the theoretical frameworks and methodologies used to understand and implement digital tax systems remain unresolved. This study conducts a Critical Review of selected high-impact Scopus Q1 publications, comprising [insert number] reviewed studies that met predefined selection criteria, including relevance to digital taxation, theoretical contribution, methodological clarity, and publication quality.. Unlike Systematic Reviews, which focus on evidence-based synthesis, the Critical Review approach offers a conceptual critique, identifying key theoretical gaps and methodological challenges in the field of digital taxation. The analytical procedure involved screening the selected studies, categorizing their theoretical perspectives and methodological approaches, comparing their conceptual strengths and limitations, and synthesizing recurring gaps to develop an integrative frameworkThe findings highlight the need for a hybrid model that integrates traditional tax principles with modern digital tax technologies to address the complexities of global digital transactions. This review contributes to the literature by proposing a novel conceptual framework that combines digital tax principles with emerging technologies like blockchain, offering new perspectives for future research. The implications of this study are significant both academically and practically, suggesting that policymakers and practitioners adopt more flexible and adaptive digital tax strategies. Future studies should focus on empirical testing of the proposed models and explore additional variables that can influence the effectiveness of digital tax systems across different contexts.
Article Details
Section

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Albahri, A. S., Duhaim, A. M., Fadhel, M. A., Alnoor, A., Baqer, N. S., Alzubaidi, L., Albahri, O. S., Alamoodi, A. H., Bai, J., Salhi, A., Santamaría, J., Ouyang, C., Gupta, A., Gu, Y., & Deveci, M. (2023). A systematic review of trustworthy and explainable artificial intelligence in healthcare: Assessment of quality, bias risk, and data fusion. Information Fusion, 96, 156–191. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2023.03.008
Aldighrir, W. M., & Asiri, F. M. (2025). Assessing Educational Leaders’ Perceptions of Virtual Intercultural Interactions in Digital Learning Environments: Development, Network Analysis and Validation of the Virtual Intercultural Interactions Scale Through a Technology-Driven Approach. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 41(5). Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.70124
Cao, Z., & Shi, X. (2021). A systematic literature review of entrepreneurial ecosystems in advanced and emerging economies. Small Business Economics, 57(1), 75–110. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-020-00326-y
Carreiras, H., & Castro, C. (2012). Qualitative methods in military studies: Research experiences and challenges (p. 194). Taylor and Francis; Scopus. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203099223
Chatpibal, M., Chaiyasoonthorn, W., & Chaveesuk, S. (2024). Driving financial results is not the only priority! An exploration of the future role of chief financial officer: A grounded theory approach. Meditari Accountancy Research, 32(3), 857–887. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEDAR-02-2023-1929
Crifo, P., & Rebérioux, A. (2024). Employee participation as a new frontier in corporate social responsibility: A review of the literature. Journal of Participation and Employee Ownership, 7(3), 241–254. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPEO-04-2022-0006
Daly, K. J. (2007). Qualitative methods for family studies & human development (p. 293). SAGE Publications Inc.; Scopus. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452224800
Dandan, S. M. M., Al-Ghaswyneh, O. F. M., & Oweis, K. A. (2025). Empowering Women Challenges after Saudization of Telecommunications Sector and its Impact on Service Quality. Quality - Access to Success, 26(204), 32–41. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.47750/QAS/26.204.05
Farhoudinia, B., Ozturkcan, S., & Kasap, N. (2025). Fake news in business and management literature: A systematic review of definitions, theories, methods and implications. Aslib Journal of Information Management, 77(2), 306–329. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1108/AJIM-09-2022-0418
Fife, W. (2020). Counting as a Qualitative Method: Grappling with the Reliability Issue in Ethnographic Research (p. 140). Springer International Publishing; Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-34803-8
Fricker, P., Hayek, U. W., & Monacella, R. (2023). Digital Landscape Architecture Education – Where Do We Stand and Where Should We Go? Journal of Digital Landscape Architecture, 2023(8), 576–584. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.14627/537740060
Gunawan, T. J., Wang, J., & Liao, P.-C. (2022). Factors of Project-Based Teaching That Enhance Learning Interest: Evidence from Construction Contract Management Course. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(22). Scopus. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142215314
Hillman, W., & Radel, K. (2018). Qualitative methods in tourism research: Theory and practice (p. 294). Channel View Publications; Scopus. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85050434848&partnerID=40&md5=7ea1e3f0b2027993b53f6a795804ee51
Iosifides, T. (2016). Qualitative Methods in Migration Studies: A Critical Realist Perspective (p. 266). Taylor and Francis; Scopus. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315603124
Kawamura, Y. (2020). DOING RESEARCH IN FASHION AND DRESS: An Introduction to Qualitative Methods, 2nd edition (p. 166). Bloomsbury Publishing Plc.; Scopus. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85188589040&partnerID=40&md5=b3db406659cd1ea5b20e05664bec39a3
Khudhair, A. H., Daud, Z. M., Mustafa, H. A. R., & Khudhair, A. N. J. (2025). Facilitators and leadership styles: Theoretical drivers for performance budgeting adoption in Iraq’s higher education sector. Cogent Business and Management, 12(1). Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2024.2437140
Kitsios, F., & Kamariotou, M. (2021). Artificial intelligence and business strategy towards digital transformation: A research agenda. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(4), 1–16. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13042025
Li, H., & Wang, Y. (2025). Adaptive Governance at Work: How Chinese State Actors Respond to Overseas Pushback on the Belt and Road Initiative. China Quarterly, 262, 445–461. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305741025000025
Liao, B., Ma, Y., & Lei, R. (2023). Analysis of ethics dumping and proposed solutions in the field of biomedical research in China. Frontiers in Pharmacology, 14. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2023.1214590
Longhofer, J., Floersch, J., & Hoy, J. (2012). Qualitative Methods for Practice Research (p. 224). Oxford University Press; Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195398472.001.0001
Løvlie, A. G. (2025). Dilemmas of children’s participation and the role of practice guidelines: The views of judicial decision-makers in Norway. International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family, 39(1). Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1093/lawfam/ebaf012
Lutz, W., & Knox, S. (2014). Quantitative and qualitative methods in psychotherapy research (p. 448). Taylor and Francis; Scopus. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203386071
Mansour, C., Márquez-Grant, N., & Benito Sánchez, M. (2025). Current status of forensic anthropology in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region. Egyptian Journal of Forensic Sciences, 15(1). Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41935-025-00423-7
McNabb, D. E. (2015). Research methods for political science: Quantitative and qualitative methods: Second edition (p. 426). Taylor and Francis; Scopus. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315701141
Migdal, A. B. (2018). Qualitative Methods in Quantum Theory (p. 460). CRC Press; Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1201/9780429497940
Mukhlis, L. (2025a). A Phenomenological Study of Personal Spiritual Experiences in Navigating Religious Pluralism within Interfaith Communities. Irfana: Journal of Religious Studies, 1(6), 212–220.
Mukhlis, L. (2025b). Spiritual Grounds for Economic Growth: A Qualitative Exploration of Rural Indonesian Women’s Transformative Journeys Through Mosque-Led Empowerment Programs. Servina: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat, 1(8), 289–298.
Mukhlis, L., & Abdullah, M. N. (2025). Hukum Keluarga Islam di Indonesia (1st ed.). Mukhlisina Revolution Center.
Mukhlis, L., Arifin, T., Ridwan, A. H., & Zulbaidah. (2024). Integrating Artificial Intelligenceand Maqāṣid al-Syarī‘ah: Revolutionizing Indonesia’s Sharia Online Trading System. Computer Fraud and Security, 2024(11), 301–309. https://doi.org/10.52710/cfs.238
Mukhlis, L., Arifin, T., Ridwan, A. H., & Zulbaidah. (2025). Reorientation of Sharia Stock Regulations: Integrating Taṣarrufāt al-Rasūl and Maqāṣid al-Sharī‘ah for Justice and Sustainability. Journal of Information Systems Engineering and Management, 10(10s), 58–66. https://doi.org/10.52783/jisem.v10i10s.1341
Mukhlis, L., Arifin, T., Ridwan, A. H., Zulbaidah, Rosadi, A., & Solehudin, E. (2025). Reformulation of Islamic Stock Law: The Application of Taṣarrufāt al-Rasūl and Maqāṣid al-Syarī‘ahto Develop a Dynamic and Sustainable Islamic Capital Market in Indonesia. Journal of Posthumanism, 5(3), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.63332/joph.v5i3.913
Mukhlis, L., Janwari, Y., & Syafe`i, R. (2023). INDONESIA STOCK EXCHANGE: THEORETICAL AND PHILOSOPHICAL ANALYSIS OF MUDHARABAH AND MUSYARAKAH CONTRACTS. Yurisprudentia: Jurnal Hukum Ekonomi, 9(2), 243–264. https://doi.org/10.24952/yurisprudentia.v9i2.8466
Mukhlis, L., Maryam, S., & Sormin, S. A. (2023). Model Pembelajaran Living History Berbasis PjBL Untuk Meningkatkan Keterampilan Histografi Mahasiswa. Jurnal Educatio FKIP UNMA, 9(4), 1800–1809. https://doi.org/10.31949/educatio.v9i4.5595
Mukhlis, L., & Saidah, Y. (2025). Dynamics of Nature-Based learning in Developing Children’s Motoricic Skills: Teacher and Parent Perspectives. HUMANISMA: Journal of Gender Studies, 9(1), 64–79. http://dx.doi.org/10.30983/humanisme.v4i2.9366
Mukhlis, L., Suradi, Janwari, Y., & Syafe`i, R. (2023). Sosialisasi Saham Syariah sebagai Instrumen Pengembangan Ekonomi Masyarakat di Badan Kontak Majelis Taklim (BKMT) Kabupaten Mandailing Natal. Jurnal Pengabdian Multidisiplin, 3(2), 2–9. https://doi.org/10.51214/japamul.v3i2.604
Prabhu, C., & Mehta, M. (2023). A new validated model of leadership development in higher education; empirical assessment using universal attributes of spiritual intelligence. Higher Education, Skills and Work-Based Learning, 13(3), 465–487. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1108/HESWBL-12-2022-0276
Silalahi, A. D. K. (2025). Can generative artificial intelligence drive sustainable behavior? A consumer-adoption model for AI-driven sustainability recommendations. Technology in Society, 83. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2025.102995
Tjahjadi, B., Soewarno, N., Sutarsa, A. A. P., & Jermias, J. (2024). Effect of intellectual capital on organizational performance in the Indonesian SOEs and subsidiaries: Roles of open innovation and organizational inertia. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 25(2–3), 423–447. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIC-06-2023-0140
Tkalac Verčič, A., Verčič, D., Čož, S., & Špoljarić, A. (2024). A systematic review of digital internal communication. Public Relations Review, 50(1). Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2023.102400
Xuemei, H., Ali, S., & Bilal, H. (2025). Carbon reduction initiatives impact on the employee relocation. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 12(1). Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-05756-1