Exploring Humanitarian Ethics in Literature: A Philosophical Study of Modern Uncertainty

Main Article Content

Musmulyadi Musmulyadi

Abstract

This study examines ethical dilemmas in contemporary literature, a critical area within the humanities that provides insights into how individuals navigate moral complexities in modern society. The research focuses on the role of literature in shaping personal responses to ethical challenges, addressing a significant gap in understanding the deeper subjective experiences of individuals in this context. Previous studies have largely explored general trends in moral reflection, but little attention has been given to how individuals interpret and respond to ethical dilemmas on a personal level. To address this gap, this study employs a phenomenological approach to investigate how literature aids individuals in making sense of moral conflict and uncertainty in the modern world. Through in-depth interviews and thematic analysis of participants' responses, the findings reveal that literature serves as a reflective space for exploring moral decisions. It allows individuals to engage with ethical issues in a deeply personal and transformative manner. The results highlight the role of literary works as vital tools for moral development, enhancing our understanding of how individuals confront ethical choices in contemporary society. These findings contribute to the broader discourse in moral philosophy and literature and suggest new pathways for future research at the intersection of ethics, literature, and personal growth.

Article Details

Section

Articles

References

Akhtar, S. (2010). Islam as political religion: The future of an imperial faith (hlm. 301). Taylor and Francis Inc.; Scopus. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203841822

Askitopoulou, H., & Vgontzas, A. N. (2018a). The relevance of the Hippocratic Oath to the ethical and moral values of contemporary medicine. Part II: interpretation of the Hippocratic Oath—Today’s perspective. European Spine Journal, 27(7), 1491–1500. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-018-5615-z

Askitopoulou, H., & Vgontzas, A. οN. (2018b). The relevance of the Hippocratic Oath to the ethical and moral values of contemporary medicine. Part I: The Hippocratic Oath from antiquity to modern times. European Spine Journal, 27(7), 1481–1490. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-017-5348-4

Bartrop, P. R. (2012). A Biographical Encyclopedia of Contemporary Genocide: Portraits of Evil and Good (hlm. 404). Bloomsbury Publishing Plc.; Scopus. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85063025793&partnerID=40&md5=e313169b74637dc472842349dd20f47b

Goodin, D. K. (2013). The new rationalism: Albert Schweitzer’s philosophy of reverence for life (hlm. 220). McGill-Queen’s University Press; Scopus. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84897184715&partnerID=40&md5=eee0af6c610fe74a01271077ec9cb0c2

Gowans, C. W. (2014). Buddhist moral philosophy: An introduction (hlm. 333). Taylor and Francis; Scopus. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315766072

Jackson, M. (2013). The wherewithal of life: Ethics, migration, and the question of well-being (hlm. 264). University of California Press; Scopus. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84905462032&partnerID=40&md5=c286da9655ea459df59d4c8f1070e336

Kaplan, U. (2016). Updating the Vinaya: Formulating Buddhist Monastic Laws and Pure Rules in Contemporary Korea. Contemporary Buddhism, 17(2), 252–274. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1080/14639947.2016.1234753

Little, B. J. (2010). Epilogue: Changing the world with archaeology. Dalam Archaeologists as activists: Can archaeologists change the world? (hlm. 154–158). The University of Alabama Press; Scopus. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84895700176&partnerID=40&md5=ac5e1756ca97c69a048fed05ae9a1ff6

MacArthur Clark, J. (2018). The 3Rs in research: A contemporary approach to replacement, reduction and refinement. British Journal of Nutrition, 120(s1), S1–S7. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007114517002227

Mannion, G. (2007). Ecclesiology and Postmodernity: Questions for the Church in Our Time (hlm. 249). Liturgical Press; Scopus. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85010674968&partnerID=40&md5=bd83b3227dcc906551804affbd38cca0

Reeves, C., & Sinnicks, M. (2021). Business Ethics from the Standpoint of Redemption: Adorno on the Possibility of Good Work. Business Ethics Quarterly, 31(4), 500–523. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1017/beq.2020.45

Sarma, G. P., & Hay, N. J. (2017). Mammalian value systems. Informatica (Slovenia), 41(4), 441–449. Scopus.

Sellars, J. (2016). The routledge handbook of the stoic tradition (hlm. 407). Taylor and Francis; Scopus. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315771588

Shaw, W. H. (2012). Utilitarianism and the ethics of war. Dalam The Cambridge Companion to: Utilitarianism (hlm. 303–324). Cambridge University Press; Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1017/CCO9781139096737.016

Smith, D. S. (2019). Shaping the modern world with a stone-age brain: The brexit referendum and the moral foundations theory. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 7(2), 863–889. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.5964/jspp.v7i2.1032

Sokos, C. K., Peterson, M. N., Birtsas, P. K., & Hasanagas, N. D. (2014). Insights for contemporary hunting from ancient hellenic culture. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 38(3), 451–457. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1002/wsb.443

Zhao, K., & Biesta, G. J. J. (2011). Lifelong Learning Between “East” and “West”: Confucianism and the Reflexive Project of the Self. Interchange, 42(1), 1–20. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10780-011-9143-6