The Effect of Discovery Learning on Fractions in Grade V
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study investigates the effect of the Discovery Learning method on elementary students’ ability to represent fractions. The study was motivated by the persistent difficulty students face in expressing fractions in visual, symbolic, and verbal forms, often due to the dominance of conventional teaching approaches. Instead of focusing on procedural instruction, Discovery Learning encourages students to actively construct knowledge, leading to deeper conceptual understanding. The findings reveal that students who learned through Discovery Learning demonstrated stronger mathematical representation skills compared to those taught using traditional methods. Beyond improving test performance, this approach fosters active engagement, problem-solving skills, and conceptual mastery of fractions. These results highlight the broader implication that discovery-based approaches can serve as an effective alternative to conventional teaching in mathematics education, particularly in addressing common challenges in fraction learning.
Article Details
Section

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Abrori, F. M., Lavicza, Z., & Anđić, B. (2024). Exploring the challenges faced by elementary school students while learning socioscientific issues through comics. International Journal of Education Through Art, 20(3), 303–324. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1386/eta_00170_1
Carreiras, H., & Castro, C. (2012). Qualitative methods in military studies: Research experiences and challenges (p. 194). Taylor and Francis; Scopus. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203099223
Clair, R. P. (2003). Expressions of ethnography: Novel approaches to qualitative methods (p. 303). State University of New York Press; Scopus. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84896556900&partnerID=40&md5=d14cc6ba1608309f0398c418b0c86e4b
Daly, K. J. (2007). Qualitative methods for family studies & human development (p. 293). SAGE Publications Inc.; Scopus. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452224800
Dichek, N. P., Kopotun, I. M., Shevchenko, S. M., Antonets, N. B., & Pohribna, D. V. (2021). Implementation of the cross-cultural approach in the modern school. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 20(4), 210–244. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.26803/IJLTER.20.4.12
Ewald, V., Sridaran Venkat, R., Asokkumar, A., Benedictus, R., Boller, C., & Groves, R. M. (2022). Perception modelling by invariant representation of deep learning for automated structural diagnostic in aircraft maintenance: A study case using DeepSHM. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 165, 108153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2021.108153
Fenton, N. E., & Baxter, J. (2016). Practicing Qualitative Methods in Health Geographies (p. 266). Taylor and Francis; Scopus. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315601946
Fife, W. (2020). Counting as a Qualitative Method: Grappling with the Reliability Issue in Ethnographic Research (p. 140). Springer International Publishing; Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-34803-8
Hermita, N., Wijaya, T. T., Yusron, E., Abidin, Y., Alim, J. A., & Putra, Z. H. (2023). Extending unified theory of acceptance and use of technology to understand the acceptance of digital textbook for elementary School in Indonesia. Frontiers in Education, 8. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.958800
Hillman, W., & Radel, K. (2018). Qualitative methods in tourism research: Theory and practice (p. 294). Channel View Publications; Scopus. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85050434848&partnerID=40&md5=7ea1e3f0b2027993b53f6a795804ee51
Hoban, R. A. (2021). Introducing the slope concept. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 52(6), 879–895. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2020.1723726
Huang, L., & Pei, X. (2024). Exploring the impact of web-based inquiry on elementary school students’ science identity development in a STEM learning unit. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11(1). Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-03299-5
Iosifides, T. (2016). Qualitative Methods in Migration Studies: A Critical Realist Perspective (p. 266). Taylor and Francis; Scopus. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315603124
Kawamura, Y. (2020). DOING RESEARCH IN FASHION AND DRESS: An Introduction to Qualitative Methods, 2nd edition (p. 166). Bloomsbury Publishing Plc.; Scopus. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85188589040&partnerID=40&md5=b3db406659cd1ea5b20e05664bec39a3
Longhofer, J., Floersch, J., & Hoy, J. (2012). Qualitative Methods for Practice Research (p. 224). Oxford University Press; Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195398472.001.0001
Luo, T., Chen, Y., So, W. W. M., & Chiu, S. W. K. (2025). Exploring predictors of STEM aspirations from a STEM capital perspective. Research in Science and Technological Education, 43(2), 614–632. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2024.2320113
Lutz, W., & Knox, S. (2014). Quantitative and qualitative methods in psychotherapy research (p. 448). Taylor and Francis; Scopus. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203386071
Marletta, M. (2025). Probabilities, costs, and justice: Rethinking precautionary measures in civil and criminal law. Law, Probability and Risk, 24(1). Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1093/lpr/mgaf007
McNabb, D. E. (2015). Research methods for political science: Quantitative and qualitative methods: Second edition (p. 426). Taylor and Francis; Scopus. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315701141
Migdal, A. B. (2018). Qualitative Methods in Quantum Theory (p. 460). CRC Press; Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1201/9780429497940
Muhtadi, A., Assagaf, G., & Hukom, J. (2022). Self-Efficacy and Students’ Mathematics Learning Ability in Indonesia: A Meta Analysis Study. International Journal of Instruction, 15(3), 1131–1146. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2022.15360a
Mukhlis, L. (2025a). A Phenomenological Study of Personal Spiritual Experiences in Navigating Religious Pluralism within Interfaith Communities. Irfana: Journal of Religious Studies, 1(6), 212–220.
Mukhlis, L. (2025b). Spiritual Grounds for Economic Growth: A Qualitative Exploration of Rural Indonesian Women’s Transformative Journeys Through Mosque-Led Empowerment Programs. Servina: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat, 1(8), 289–298.
Mukhlis, L., & Abdullah, M. N. (2025). Hukum Keluarga Islam di Indonesia (1st ed.). Mukhlisina Revolution Center.
Mukhlis, L., Arifin, T., Ridwan, A. H., & Zulbaidah. (2024). Integrating Artificial Intelligenceand Maqāṣid al-Syarī‘ah: Revolutionizing Indonesia’s Sharia Online Trading System. Computer Fraud and Security, 2024(11), 301–309. https://doi.org/10.52710/cfs.238
Mukhlis, L., Arifin, T., Ridwan, A. H., & Zulbaidah. (2025). Reorientation of Sharia Stock Regulations: Integrating Taṣarrufāt al-Rasūl and Maqāṣid al-Sharī‘ah for Justice and Sustainability. Journal of Information Systems Engineering and Management, 10(10s), 58–66. https://doi.org/10.52783/jisem.v10i10s.1341
Mukhlis, L., Arifin, T., Ridwan, A. H., Zulbaidah, Rosadi, A., & Solehudin, E. (2025). Reformulation of Islamic Stock Law: The Application of Taṣarrufāt al-Rasūl and Maqāṣid al-Syarī‘ahto Develop a Dynamic and Sustainable Islamic Capital Market in Indonesia. Journal of Posthumanism, 5(3), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.63332/joph.v5i3.913
Mukhlis, L., Janwari, Y., & Syafe`i, R. (2023). INDONESIA STOCK EXCHANGE: THEORETICAL AND PHILOSOPHICAL ANALYSIS OF MUDHARABAH AND MUSYARAKAH CONTRACTS. Yurisprudentia: Jurnal Hukum Ekonomi, 9(2), 243–264. https://doi.org/10.24952/yurisprudentia.v9i2.8466
Mukhlis, L., Maryam, S., & Sormin, S. A. (2023). Model Pembelajaran Living History Berbasis PjBL Untuk Meningkatkan Keterampilan Histografi Mahasiswa. Jurnal Educatio FKIP UNMA, 9(4), 1800–1809. https://doi.org/10.31949/educatio.v9i4.5595
Mukhlis, L., & Saidah, Y. (2025). Dynamics of Nature-Based learning in Developing Children’s Motoricic Skills: Teacher and Parent Perspectives. HUMANISMA: Journal of Gender Studies, 9(1), 64–79. http://dx.doi.org/10.30983/humanisme.v4i2.9366
Mukhlis, L., Suradi, Janwari, Y., & Syafe`i, R. (2023). Sosialisasi Saham Syariah sebagai Instrumen Pengembangan Ekonomi Masyarakat di Badan Kontak Majelis Taklim (BKMT) Kabupaten Mandailing Natal. Jurnal Pengabdian Multidisiplin, 3(2), 2–9. https://doi.org/10.51214/japamul.v3i2.604
Murphy, E., & Dingwall, R. (2017). Qualitative methods and health policy research (p. 230). Taylor and Francis; Scopus. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315127873
Nosofsky, R. M., & Hu, M. (2022). Generalization in Distant Regions of a Rule-Described Category Space: A Mixed Exemplar and Logical-Rule-Based Account. Computational Brain and Behavior, 5(4), 435–466. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42113-022-00151-4
Song, Y., & Yu, Y. (2025). Exploring the EEG representation of English listening comprehension under hypoxic conditions. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 19. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2025.1540539
Xu, L., & Zhai, W. (2019). A three-dimensional dynamic model for train-track interactions. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 76, 443–465. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2019.04.037